ONE LIBERTY PROPERTIES INC

OLP
About the company

One Liberty Properties, Inc. is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust. OLP acquires, owns and manages a geographically diversified portfolio consisting primarily of industrial properties. As of December 31, 2025, OLP owns 103 properties, including a property owned by a consolidated joint venture. The 103 properties are in 30 states. One Liberty Properties, Inc.

Country: United StatesPrice: $21.24Market Cap: $465.3M

Investment snapshot

18%positive consensus
Scored 1d ago

Positive

3

BUY / PASS

Neutral / negative

3 / 10

NEUTRAL / FAIL

Median fair value

$19.65

-7.5% vs price

Models with upside

2 / 17

Positive margin of safety

Key risk

All 8 investors flag OLP's efficiency

Framework analysis

VerdictMeaning
BUYPositive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met.
PASSThe company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state.
NEUTRALNeither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position.
FAILThe company does not clear the framework's requirements.
RankedRanked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL.

Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.

MetricGraham

Defensive Value

Buffett

Quality Compounder

Lynch

GARP

Greenblatt

Magic Formula

Piotroski

F-Score

Dreman

Contrarian Value

Munger

Quality Focus

Pabrai

Dhandho Framework

Akre

Three-Legged Stool

Marks

Risk-Aware Value

Ackman

Activist Value

Templeton

Global Bargain Hunter

Sleep

Scale Economies Shared

Asness

Systematic Factors

Neff

Low-P/E Total Return

Schloss

Asset-Value Discipline

O'Shaughnessy

Systematic Factor Composite

VerdictFAILFAILFAILNot rankedPASSFAILPASSNEUTRALFAILFAILFAILPASSFAILNEUTRALFAILFAILNEUTRAL
Score
AnalysisChecking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…
Intrinsic Value (annual)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Margin of Safety-10.3%N/AN/A-13.9%N/A-8.1%N/A+7.2%-8.6%-3.4%N/A+8.9%N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Financial Basis

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-04

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-04

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-04

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-04

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-04

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-11-04

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-04

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-04

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-03-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-11-04

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-04

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-04

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Where It Passes

    Where It Falls Short

    • Efficiency0% pass✗ 11▾

      All 8 investors flag OLP's efficiency

      Current Ratio
      ✗Graham>= 2.0
      ROIC (3-5 yr avg)5.7%
      ✗Buffett> 10%
      ROIC - WACC-4.3%
      ✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
      EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)
      ✗Greenblatt> 25%
      Current Ratio Change YoY
      ✗PiotroskiIncreased YoY
      Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY
      ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
      Current Assets / Current Liabilities
      ✗Dreman> 1.5
      Return on Invested Capital4.9%
      ✗Munger> 15%
      ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=5.5%; FY2024: ROIC=5.4%; FY2025: ROIC=4.6%
      ✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in each
      Reinvestment Rate x ROIC0.0% (RR=0% x ROIC=4.9%)
      ✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
      ROIC (5-year)0/5 years above 12% (latest 4.6%)
      ✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years
    • Debt & Leverage8% pass✓ 1✗ 14▾

      11 of 12 flag OLP's debt & leverage — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +8 more

      LT Debt vs Net Current Assets
      ✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
      Debt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 1.80, IC: 1.9x
      ✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
      Total Debt / Equity1.80
      ✗Lynch< 0.33
      Cash - Long-term Debt
      ✗LynchPositive preferred
      LT Debt / Total Assets Change0.00% -> 0.00%
      ✓PiotroskiDecreased YoY
      Current Assets / Current Liabilities
      ✗Dreman> 1.5✗SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)
      Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity1.80
      ✗Dreman< 0.8✗Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✗SchlossD/E < 1.00x
      Debt Levels1.80
      ✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3
      Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=1.9x, D/EBITDA=6.4x
      ✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
      Total Debt / Shareholders Equity1.80
      ✗Ackman<= 1.0
      Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-1.7955; #3716/4210 (top 88.3%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    • Profitability13% pass✓ 9✗ 26▾

      14 of 16 flag OLP's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +11 more

      Net income / market capitalization+5.46%; #1553/6340 (top 24.5%)
      ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
      Positive EPS (10 years)17/23 years positive
      ✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
      EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
      ✗Graham>= 33% growth
      Net Income Positive (10+ years)22/23 years positive
      ✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
      ROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)10.8%
      ✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)
      Operating Margin (10-yr trend)68.9% (latest)
      ✓BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
      Free Cash Flow Proxy
      ✗BuffettPositive and growing
      Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)0.28
      ✓BuffettCoV < 0.3
      Retained Earnings Effectiveness
      ✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
      Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 18.5x (growth N/A)
      ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
      3-5 Year EPS CAGR-2.9%
      ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
      ROE8.6%
      ✗Lynch> 15%
      EBIT / Enterprise Value4.9%
      ✗Greenblatt> 10%
      Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=4.9%, ROC=None
      ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
      Net Income / Total Assets2.97%
      ✓PiotroskiROA > 0
      ROA Change YoY3.97% -> 2.97% (delta: -1.00%)
      ✗PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
      (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=4.38%, ROA=2.97%
      ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
      Gross Margin Change YoY
      ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
      Pre-Tax Income / Revenue
      ✗Dreman>= 8%
      Net Income / Shareholders' Equity8.6%
      ✗Dreman> 12%
      Margin of SafetyP/FFO=8.4x
      ✓PabraiP/FFO < 15
      Return on Equity9.4% (3-yr avg)
      ✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
      Discount to Intrinsic Value-8.1% (IV=$19.65 vs Price=$21.24)
      ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
      Positive Net Income Frequency22/22 years positive
      ✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
      Operating Income / Revenue
      ✗Ackman>= 15%
      Net Income / Shareholders Equity8.6%
      ✗Ackman>= 15%
      5-Year EPS CAGR-2.9% CAGR over 5 years
      ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
      Operating Margin Trend
      ✗TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 years
      Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trend
      ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
      Gross profit / total assets
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
      Net income / positive book equity+8.55%; #2026/5226 (top 38.8%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
      Negative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.0089; #757/5884 (top 12.9%)
      ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
      3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR-2.9% over 5 years
      ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
      Positive Diluted-EPS Years10/10 years positive
      ✓Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)
    • Growth13% pass✓ 3✗ 10▾

      7 of 8 flag OLP's growth — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +4 more

      EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
      ✗Graham>= 33% growth
      Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 18.5x (growth N/A)
      ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
      3-5 Year EPS CAGR-2.9%
      ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
      Inventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthN/A (no inventory)
      ✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
      EPS Growth Direction$1.82 (2009) -> $1.15 (2025)
      ✗DremanPositive over recent years
      EPS CAGR-2.8% CAGR over 16 years
      ✗Dreman> 5% annualized
      Positive Net Income Frequency22/22 years positive
      ✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
      3yr Median Revenue Growth
      ✗Ackman>= 5%
      Positive EPS Growth Frequency3/5 years with positive EPS growth
      ✓AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
      5-Year EPS CAGR-2.9% CAGR over 5 years
      ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
      Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trend
      ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
      5-year Revenue CAGR
      ✗SleepCAGR > 7%
      3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR-2.9% over 5 years
      ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
    • Verdicts23% pass✓ 3✗ 10▾

      Split decision: 10 FAIL · 3 PASS · 3 NEUTRAL

      Overall verdict
      ✗GrahamFAIL (2/7)✗BuffettFAIL (2/9)✗LynchFAIL (2/7)•GreenblattNot ranked✓PiotroskiPASS (F-Score 4)✗DremanFAIL (2/10)✓MungerPASS (2/4)•PabraiNEUTRAL (2/3)✗AkreFAIL (0/6)✗MarksFAIL (3/5)✗AckmanFAIL (3/9)✓TempletonPASS (4/8)✗SleepFAIL (1/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗NeffFAIL (2/6)✗SchlossFAIL (2/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked)
    • Valuation models29% pass✓ 2✗ 5▾

      Models split on OLP at $21.24 — fair values range $18.65–$23.31

      Graham fair value$19.25
      ✗Graham-10.3% margin vs $21.24
      Greenblatt fair value$18.65
      ✗Greenblatt-13.9% margin vs $21.24
      Dreman fair value$19.65
      ✗Dreman-8.1% margin vs $21.24
      Pabrai fair value$22.89
      ✓Pabrai+7.2% margin vs $21.24
      Akre fair value$19.55
      ✗Akre-8.6% margin vs $21.24
      Marks fair value$20.55
      ✗Marks-3.4% margin vs $21.24
      Templeton fair value$23.31
      ✓Templeton+8.9% margin vs $21.24
    • Valuation31% pass✓ 9✗ 16▾

      9 of 13 flag OLP's valuation — Lynch, Greenblatt, Dreman +6 more

      Price / Book Value per Share1.5x
      ✓Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)
      Net income / market capitalization+5.46%; #1553/6340 (top 24.5%)
      ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
      Price / FFO per Share8.4x
      ✓Graham<= 15x✓Dreman< 12x✓Ackman<= 25
      Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 18.5x (growth N/A)
      ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
      EBIT / Enterprise Value4.9%
      ✗Greenblatt> 10%
      Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=4.9%, ROC=None
      ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
      Price / (CFO / Shares)11.8x
      ✗Dreman< 8x
      Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=18.5x, OE Yield=11.9%
      ✓MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
      P/FFO or FFO YieldP/FFO=8.4x, FFO Yield=11.3%
      ✓PabraiP/FFO < 15 or FFO Yield > 10%
      P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=18.5x, P/B=1.5x
      ✓MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
      Discount to Intrinsic Value-8.1% (IV=$19.65 vs Price=$21.24)
      ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
      Price / EPS18.5x
      ✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)
      Price vs. Trailing Low106% of trailing low ($20.09)
      ✓Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)
      Positive book equity / market capitalization+0.6385; #2391/6449 (top 37.1%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
      Price / Diluted EPS18.5x
      ✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)
      (EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E0.32
      ✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)
      Price / Tangible Book Value per Share1.48x
      ✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)
      Book Value per Share Change-2.1%
      ✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)
      Revenue / market capitalization
      ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
      (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization
      ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
      Trailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-6.64%; #3230/6202 (top 52.1%)
      ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    • Cash Flow33% pass✓ 3✗ 4▾

      4 of 6 flag OLP's cash flow — Buffett, Dreman, Neff +1 more

      Free Cash Flow Proxy
      ✗BuffettPositive and growing
      Operating Cash Flow$37.5M
      ✓PiotroskiCFO > 0
      (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=4.38%, ROA=2.97%
      ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
      Price / (CFO / Shares)11.8x
      ✗Dreman< 8x
      Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency20/20 years positive
      ✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years
      Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures
      ✗Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)
      (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization
      ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section

    Business & financials

    Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.

    Company Profile

    Industry: Trading
    SIC Sector: Holding & Investment Offices
    Size: Small Cap($465.3M)
    Revenue: N/A
    Net Income: $25.5M-16.3% YoY

    Financial Snapshot

    Operating Margin--
    Return on Equity8.5%
    Debt / Equity1.73
    Current Ratio--
    EPS (Diluted)$1.15−17.9% 1y
    Shares Retired−1.1% / −2.9% 2y
    Sector-adjusted criteria: REIT

    Depreciation distorts REIT earnings and book value, so FFO-based criteria replace P/E and free-cash-flow tests, and P/B tests are omitted.

    Shareholder Return

    Fiscal 2025

    Issued 1.1% of shares last year, 2.9% issued over two.

    Buybacks
    —
    Dividends
    $39.0M

    What drove EPS

    A buyback raises earnings per share without the company earning more. This splits each year's change into the two.

    FY22
    7.6% = 8.5% + −0.9%
    FY23
    −30.7% = −29.8% + −1.2%
    FY24
    1.4% = 2.7% + −1.2%
    FY25
    −17.9% = −16.3% + −1.9%
    Earnings Fewer shares More shares

    Share count is the denominator the filer used for diluted EPS, recovered as net income ÷ EPS — not the balance-sheet count, which is a point-in-time figure and would put the timing difference into this split. Years with a loss are omitted: a smaller share count makes a loss per share larger, so the decomposition inverts.

    Company Financials

    Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years

    TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.

    The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.

    MetricTTM · 2026-09-30

    2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30

    Sources · derived quarter values

    Derived from cumulative filings: net income, operating income, ebit, interest expense, operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, dividends paid.

    Q3 FY 2026

    2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30

    Sources · derived quarter values

    Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, dividends paid.

    Q2 FY 2026

    2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30

    Sources · derived quarter values

    Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, dividends paid.

    Q1 FY 2026

    2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31

    Sources
    FY 2025
    Sources
    • 10-K · 2026-03-06
    FY 2024
    Sources
    • 10-K · 2025-03-06
    FY 2023
    Sources
    • 10-K · 2024-03-06
    FY 2022
    Sources
    • 10-K · 2023-03-14
    FY 2021
    Sources
    • 10-K · 2022-03-11
    Market Cap$465.3Mcurrent------$441.6Mest.$482.1Mest.$347.5Mest.$380.2Mest.$445.0Mest.
    Revenue----------------$82.7M
    Operating Income$51.5M↓9%$8.2M↓49%$22.8M↑48%$13.5M↑40%$47.9M↓4%$49.9M↓1%$50.3M↓7%$54.1M↓5%$57.0M
    Net Income$25.4M↓24%$1.1M↓90%$15.7M↑86%$6.2M↑50%$25.5M↓16%$30.4M↑3%$29.6M↓30%$42.2M↑9%$38.9M
    EPS (Diluted)--$0.04↓92%$0.71↑82%$0.28↑56%$1.15↓18%$1.40↑1%$1.38↓31%$1.99↑8%$1.85
    Gross Margin—————————
    Operating Margin————————68.9%
    ROE8.6%↓22%———8.5%↓14%9.9%↑2%9.7%↓28%13.3%↑5%12.7%
    Total Debt$533.4M↑16%$533.4M↑16%$528.3M↑18%$529.5M↑14%$517.3M↑23%$420.6M↑1%$418.3M↑3%$405.2M↑2%$396.3M
    Shareholders' Equity$297.1M↓3%$297.1M↓3%$304.4M$297.4M↓2%$299.6M↓3%$307.4M$306.7M↓3%$316.0M↑3%$305.3M
    Current Ratio—————————
    Debt / Equity1.80↑20%1.80↑20%1.74↑17%1.78↑16%1.73↑26%1.371.36↑6%1.28↓1%1.30
    Operating Cash Flow$36.3M↓19%$8.6M↓20%$12.0M↑7%$11.2M↑2%$37.5M↓4%$39.1M↓15%$46.1M↑4%$44.2M↓9%$48.6M
    Free Cash Flow------------------

    Score history

    Historical Score Timeline

    Industry peers

    Industry Peers

    Similar companies in Trading

    OLP vs Peers — Financial Grading

    RevenueN/A
    Net Income$25.5MBottom 25%
    ROE8.5%Median
    D/E1.73Bottom 25%
    Op. Margin—
    Curr. Ratio—
    CompanyMarket CapPriceRevenueNet IncomeROED/EOp. MarginCurr. RatioGrahamBuffettLynchGreenblattPiotroskiDreman
    REALTY INCOME CORPO$56.1B$58.82$5.7B$1.1B2.7%0.6316.8%—2/71/93/70/3F-Score 64/10
    Ventas, Inc.VTR$47.0B$88.92$5.8B$261.5M2.1%1.043.5%—2/71/92/70/3F-Score 62/10
    RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL INCRJF$32.4B$168.64$15.9B$2.1B17.1%0.28——3/93/93/71/3F-Score 64/11
    ROYAL GOLD INCRGLD$21.7B$256.89$1.0B$466.3M6.5%0.1361.9%3.124/92/94/70/3F-Score 44/11
    iShares Ethereum Trust ETFETHA$19.4B$44.02—$2.3B——————————
    KIMCO REALTY CORPKIM$17.0B$25.55$2.1B$584.7M5.6%0.7436.0%—3/72/94/70/3F-Score 75/10
    LandBridge Co LLCLB$5.6B$73.15$199.1M$30.1M8.9%1.6559.5%4.872/93/92/70/3F-Score 63/11
    Digital Turbine, Inc.APPS$927.6M$7.61$565.3M$37.7M-19.6%1.886.0%1.161/92/92/71/3F-Score 70/11