PyroGenesis Canada Inc.

PYRGF
About the company

PyroGenesis Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and commercializes plasma processes and solutions worldwide. The company offers DROSRITE, a process for enhancing metal recovery from dross without any hazardous by-products; plasma atomization process that allows produce and sell spherical metal powders; PUREVAP, a process to produce high purity metallurgical and solar grade silicon from quartz; and PUREVAP NSiR, which is designed to transform silicon into spherical silicon nano powders and nanowires for use in lithium-ion batteries.

Country: CanadaPrice: $0.13Market Cap: $30.3M

Investment snapshot

0%positive consensus
Scored 1d ago

Positive

0

BUY / PASS

Neutral / negative

1 / 15

NEUTRAL / FAIL

Median fair value

—

No comparable estimates

Models with upside

0 / 17

Positive margin of safety

Strongest signal

7 of 12 pass — Buffett, Piotroski, Dreman +2 more object

Key risk

No clean pass — all 16 investors flag at least one profitability criterion

Framework analysis

VerdictMeaning
BUYPositive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met.
PASSThe company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state.
NEUTRALNeither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position.
FAILThe company does not clear the framework's requirements.
RankedRanked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL.

Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.

MetricGraham

Defensive Value

Buffett

Quality Compounder

Lynch

GARP

Greenblatt

Magic Formula

Piotroski

F-Score

Dreman

Contrarian Value

Munger

Quality Focus

Pabrai

Dhandho Framework

Akre

Three-Legged Stool

Marks

Risk-Aware Value

Ackman

Activist Value

Templeton

Global Bargain Hunter

Sleep

Scale Economies Shared

Asness

Systematic Factors

Neff

Low-P/E Total Return

Schloss

Asset-Value Discipline

O'Shaughnessy

Systematic Factor Composite

VerdictFAILFAILFAILFAIL · Rank #2984 (Top 96.4%)FAILFAILFAILFAILFAILFAILFAILFAILFAILFAILFAILFAILNEUTRAL
Score
AnalysisChecking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…
Intrinsic Value (annual)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Margin of SafetyN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Financial Basis

Annual history · FY 2022

Latest source filing: 2023-03-31

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2022

Latest source filing: 2023-03-31

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2022

Latest source filing: 2023-03-31

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2022

Latest source filing: 2023-03-31

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2022

Latest source filing: 2023-03-31

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2022 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2023-03-31

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2022

Latest source filing: 2023-03-31

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2022

Latest source filing: 2023-03-31

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2022 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2023-03-31

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2022 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2023-03-31

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2022 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2023-03-31

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2022 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2023-03-31

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2022 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2023-03-31

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2022 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2023-03-31

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2022

Latest source filing: 2023-03-31

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2022

Latest source filing: 2023-03-31

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2022 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2023-03-31

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Where It Passes

  • Debt & Leverage58% pass✓ 10✗ 5▾

    7 of 12 pass — Buffett, Piotroski, Dreman +2 more object

    LT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $0.2M vs NCA $1.2M
    ✓GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
    Debt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.02, IC: -260.4x
    ✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
    Total Debt / Equity0.02
    ✓Lynch< 0.33
    Cash - Long-term Debt$2.3M
    ✓LynchPositive preferred
    LT Debt / Total Assets Change0.15% -> 0.67%
    ✗PiotroskiDecreased YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities1.06
    ✗Dreman> 1.5✗SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)
    Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0.02
    ✓Dreman< 0.8✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓SchlossD/E < 1.00x
    Debt Levels0.02
    ✓MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✓AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3
    Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=-260.4x, D/EBITDA=N/A (D&A unavailable)
    ✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
    Total Debt / Shareholders Equity0.02
    ✓Ackman<= 1.0
    Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-0.0231; #783/4210 (top 18.6%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section

Where It Falls Short

  • Profitability0% pass✓ 2✗ 33▾

    No clean pass — all 16 investors flag at least one profitability criterion

    Positive EPS (10 years)1/5 years positive
    ✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Net Income Positive (10+ years)1/5 years positive
    ✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
    ROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)-71.6%
    ✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)
    Operating Margin (10-yr trend)-122.0% (latest)
    ✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
    Free Cash Flow Proxy
    ✗BuffettPositive and growing
    Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)
    ✗BuffettCoV < 0.3
    Retained Earnings Effectiveness
    ✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    ROE-190.7%
    ✗Lynch> 15%
    EBIT / Enterprise Value-61.0%
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-61.0%, ROC=-1390.5%
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Net Income / Total Assets-67.48%
    ✗PiotroskiROA > 0
    ROA Change YoY-55.08% -> -67.48% (delta: -12.40%)
    ✗PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-23.35%, ROA=-67.48%
    ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Gross Margin Change YoY40.0% -> 42.8%
    ✓PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Pre-Tax Income / Revenue-168.8%
    ✗Dreman>= 8%
    Net Income / Shareholders' Equity-190.7%
    ✗Dreman> 12%
    Margin of SafetyP/B=1.9x
    ✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15
    Return on Equity-71.6% (3-yr avg)
    ✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
    Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Positive Net Income Frequency1/4 years positive
    ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    Operating Income / Revenue-122.0%
    ✗Ackman>= 15%
    Net Income / Shareholders Equity-190.7%
    ✗Ackman>= 15%
    5-Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Operating Margin Trend-7.3% (2020) -> -122.0% (2022)
    ✗TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 years
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 58.0% -> 42.8%, operating margin -7.3% -> -122.0%
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    Net income / market capitalization-78.25%; #5270/6340 (top 83.1%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Gross profit / total assets+17.09%; #2273/3702 (top 61.4%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Net income / positive book equity-190.69%; #4860/5226 (top 93.0%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Negative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.5769; #5023/5884 (top 85.4%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
    Positive Diluted-EPS Years
    ✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)
  • Valuation0% pass✓ 2✗ 26▾

    No clean pass — all 13 investors flag at least one valuation criterion

    Price / 3-yr avg EPS
    ✗Graham<= 15x
    Price-to-Book Ratio1.9x
    ✗Graham<= 1.5x
    P/E x P/B
    ✗Graham<= 22.5
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    EBIT / Enterprise Value-61.0%
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-61.0%, ROC=-1390.5%
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Price / EPS
    ✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)
    Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)
    ✗Dreman< 8x
    Price / Book Value per Share1.9x
    ✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)
    Valuation Reasonableness
    ✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
    P/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=-28.0%
    ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/B=1.9x
    ✓MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
    Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Price / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)
    ✗Ackman<= 25
    Price vs. Trailing Low100% of trailing low ($0.13)
    ✓Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)
    Net income / market capitalization-78.25%; #5270/6340 (top 83.1%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Positive book equity / market capitalization+0.4104; #3226/6449 (top 50.0%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Price / Diluted EPS
    ✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)
    (EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E
    ✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)
    Price / Tangible Book Value per Share2.60x
    ✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)
    Book Value per Share Change
    ✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)
    Revenue / market capitalization+0.4625; #2740/5247 (top 52.2%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-28.04%; #3638/4519 (top 80.5%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Trailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-51.80%; #5200/6202 (top 83.8%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
  • Cash Flow0% pass✓ 1✗ 11▾

    No clean pass — all 10 investors flag at least one cash flow criterion

    Free Cash Flow Proxy
    ✗BuffettPositive and growing
    FCF Positive and Growing$-8.5M
    ✗LynchPositive and growing
    Operating Cash Flow$-8.2M
    ✗PiotroskiCFO > 0
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-23.35%, ROA=-67.48%
    ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)
    ✗Dreman< 8x
    P/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=-28.0%
    ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    FCF Positive0/4 years FCF positive
    ✗MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years
    (OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap-36.6%
    ✗Ackman>= 4%
    Price / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)
    ✗Ackman<= 25
    Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency0/4 years positive
    ✗SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years
    Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$-8.5M
    ✗Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-28.04%; #3638/4519 (top 80.5%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
  • Growth0% pass✓ 1✗ 12▾

    No clean pass — all 8 investors flag at least one growth criterion

    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    Inventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: 98.8% vs Rev: -42.4%
    ✗LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
    EPS Growth Direction$-0.05 (2019) -> $-0.14 (2022)
    ✗DremanPositive over recent years
    EPS CAGR
    ✗Dreman> 5% annualized
    Positive Net Income Frequency1/4 years positive
    ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    3yr Median Revenue Growth74.9%
    ✓Ackman>= 5%
    Positive EPS Growth Frequency2/3 years with positive EPS growth
    ✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
    5-Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 58.0% -> 42.8%, operating margin -7.3% -> -122.0%
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    5-year Revenue CAGR
    ✗SleepCAGR > 7%
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
  • Efficiency0% pass✗ 11▾

    All 8 investors flag PYRGF's efficiency

    Current Ratio1.06
    ✗Graham>= 2.0
    ROIC (3-5 yr avg)-57.1%
    ✗Buffett> 10%
    ROIC - WACC-67.1%
    ✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
    EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)-1390.5%
    ✗Greenblatt> 25%
    Current Ratio Change YoY1.57 -> 1.06
    ✗PiotroskiIncreased YoY
    Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.45x -> 0.40x
    ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities1.06
    ✗Dreman> 1.5
    Return on Invested Capital-106.2%
    ✗Munger> 15%
    ROIC (high and growing)FY2020: ROIC=-1.7%; FY2021: ROIC=-33.4%; FY2022: ROIC=-106.2%
    ✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in each
    Reinvestment Rate x ROICN/A (non-positive net income)
    ✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
    ROIC (5-year)0/3 years above 12% (latest -106.2%)
    ✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years
  • Verdicts0% pass✗ 16▾

    Split decision: 15 FAIL · 1 NEUTRAL

    Overall verdict
    ✗GrahamFAIL (1/9)✗BuffettFAIL (0/9)✗LynchFAIL (2/7)✗GreenblattRank #2984✗PiotroskiFAIL (F-Score 2)✗DremanFAIL (1/11)✗MungerFAIL (1/4)✗PabraiFAIL (0/3)✗AkreFAIL (2/6)✗MarksFAIL (1/5)✗AckmanFAIL (2/9)✗TempletonFAIL (3/8)✗SleepFAIL (1/6)✗AsnessFAIL (Rank #1907/2370 (Top 80.5%))✗NeffFAIL (1/6)✗SchlossFAIL (1/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked)

Business & financials

Financial snapshot: annual FY 2022. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.

Company Profile

Industry: Pharmaceutical Products
SIC Sector: Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals
Size: Micro Cap($30.3M)
Revenue: $14.0M-42.4% YoY
Net Income: $23.7M+21.3% YoY

Financial Snapshot

Operating Margin-122.0%
Return on Equity-190.7%
Debt / Equity0.02
Current Ratio1.06
EPS (Diluted)$-0.14
Buybacks (1y)$0
Buybacks (2y)$3.3M
Shares Retired−4.2% / −17.0% 2y

Shareholder Return

Fiscal 2022

Issued 4.2% of shares last year, 17.0% issued over two.

Buybacks
$0
Dividends
—

Company Financials

Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years

TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.

MetricFY 2022
Sources
  • 40-F · 2023-03-31
FY 2021
Sources
  • 40-F · 2022-04-01
FY 2020
Sources
  • 40-F/A · 2021-04-13
FY 2019
Sources
  • 40-F/A · 2021-04-13
FY 2018
Sources
  • 40-F/A · 2021-04-13
Market Cap$30.3Mcurrent$458.3Mest.$477.6Mest.$39.7Mest.--
Revenue$14.0M↓42%$24.4M↑75%$13.9M↑295%$3.5M--
Operating Income-$17.1M↓26%-$13.6M↓1234%-$1.0M↑83%-$5.9M--
Net Income-$23.7M↑21%-$30.2M↓192%$32.8M↑587%-$6.7M--
EPS (Diluted)$-0.14↑22%$-0.18↓185%$0.21↑513%$-0.05--
Gross Margin42.8%↑7%40.0%↓31%58.0%↑115%27.0%—
Operating Margin-122.0%↓119%-55.8%↓663%-7.3%↑96%-168.5%—
ROE-190.7%↓102%-94.3%↓234%70.3%↓53%150.8%—
Total Debt$287.8K↑92%$149.8K↑69%$88.4K↓76%$363.7K↑100%$181.5K
Shareholders' Equity$12.4M↓61%$32.0M↓31%$46.6M↑1145%-$4.5M↓504%-$738.5K
Current Ratio1.06↓32%1.57↓29%2.20↑1844%0.11—
Debt / Equity0.02↑394%0.00↑147%0.00↑102%-0.08↑67%-0.25
Operating Cash Flow-$8.2M↑42%-$14.2M↓2124%-$639.2K↑74%-$2.4M--
Free Cash Flow-$8.5M↑45%-$15.4M↓1194%-$1.2M↑61%-$3.0M--

Score history

Historical Score Timeline

Industry peers

Industry Peers

Similar companies in Pharmaceutical Products

PYRGF vs Peers — Financial Grading

Revenue$14.0MBottom 25%
Net Income$23.7MBottom 25%
ROE-190.7%Bottom 25%
D/E0.02Top 25%
Op. Margin-122.0%Bottom 25%
Curr. Ratio1.06Bottom 25%
CompanyMarket CapPriceRevenueNet IncomeROED/EOp. MarginCurr. RatioGrahamBuffettLynchGreenblattPiotroskiDreman
Merck & Co., Inc.MRK$364.3B$147.76$65.0B$18.3B34.7%0.94—1.542/95/94/70/3F-Score 41/11
ABBOTT LABORATORIESABT$188.0B$108.52$44.3B$6.5B12.5%0.2518.2%1.583/94/92/71/3F-Score 53/11
BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB COBMY$129.7B$63.43$48.2B$7.1B38.2%2.4419.4%1.262/91/93/71/3F-Score 85/11
BIO-TECHNE CorpTECH$11.4B$72.80$1.2B$73.4M3.8%—8.4%3.464/93/93/70/3F-Score 54/11
REPLIGEN CORPRGEN$10.7B$167.79$738.3M$48.9M2.3%0.267.5%8.373/92/93/70/3F-Score 75/11
IONIS PHARMACEUTICALS INCIONS$4.8B$29.06$943.7M$381.4M-78.0%3.60-40.4%3.833/91/91/70/3F-Score 43/11
NEOGEN CORPNEOG$2.5B$11.23$870.4M$7.9M-0.4%0.76-2.5%3.823/91/92/70/3F-Score 64/11
Pharvaris N.V.PHVS$2.4B$33.36—$206.4M-64.8%0.00——0/90/92/70/3F-Score 22/11