Radiopharm Theranostics Ltd

RADX
About the company

Radiopharm Theranostics Limited a clinical-stage radiotherapeutics company, engages in the research and development of radiopharmaceutical products for diagnostic and therapeutic uses in areas with high unmet medical needs. The company develops several products, including RAD101, a pivalate brain metastasis diagnostic; RAD102, a pivalate therapeutic; RAD201a, a Nano-mAb HER-2 breast diagnostic; RAD202, a Nano-mAb HER-2 breast therapeutic; RAD203, a Nano-mAb PDL1 non-small cell lung diagnostic; and RAD204, a Nano-mAb PDL1 non-small cell lung therapeutic.

Country: AustraliaPrice: $0.76Market Cap: $11.9M

Investment snapshot

6%positive consensus
Scored 1d ago

Positive

1

BUY / PASS

Neutral / negative

2 / 13

NEUTRAL / FAIL

Median fair value

—

No comparable estimates

Models with upside

0 / 17

Positive margin of safety

Key risk

No clean pass — all 13 investors flag at least one valuation criterion

Framework analysis

VerdictMeaning
BUYPositive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met.
PASSThe company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state.
NEUTRALNeither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position.
FAILThe company does not clear the framework's requirements.
RankedRanked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL.

Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.

MetricGraham

Defensive Value

Buffett

Quality Compounder

Lynch

GARP

Greenblatt

Magic Formula

Piotroski

F-Score

Dreman

Contrarian Value

Munger

Quality Focus

Pabrai

Dhandho Framework

Akre

Three-Legged Stool

Marks

Risk-Aware Value

Ackman

Activist Value

Templeton

Global Bargain Hunter

Sleep

Scale Economies Shared

Asness

Systematic Factors

Neff

Low-P/E Total Return

Schloss

Asset-Value Discipline

O'Shaughnessy

Systematic Factor Composite

VerdictFAILFAILFAILNot rankedPASSFAILFAILFAILFAILFAILFAILFAILFAILNEUTRALFAILFAILNEUTRAL
Score
AnalysisChecking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…
Intrinsic Value (annual)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Margin of SafetyN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Financial Basis

Annual history · FY 2024

Latest source filing: 2025-09-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2024

Latest source filing: 2025-09-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2024

Latest source filing: 2025-09-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2024

Latest source filing: 2025-09-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2024

Latest source filing: 2025-09-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2024 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2025-09-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2024

Latest source filing: 2025-09-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2024

Latest source filing: 2025-09-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2024 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2025-09-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2024 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2025-09-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2024 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2025-09-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2024 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2025-09-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2024 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2025-09-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2024 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2025-09-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2024

Latest source filing: 2025-09-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2024

Latest source filing: 2025-09-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2024 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2025-09-18

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Where It Passes

    Where It Falls Short

    • Valuation0% pass✓ 2✗ 26▾

      No clean pass — all 13 investors flag at least one valuation criterion

      Price / 3-yr avg EPS
      ✗Graham<= 15x
      Price-to-Book Ratio
      ✗Graham<= 1.5x
      P/E x P/B
      ✗Graham<= 22.5
      Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
      ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
      EBIT / Enterprise ValueN/A (EV <= 0)
      ✗Greenblatt> 10%
      Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=N/A (EV <= 0), ROC=N/A (invested capital <= 0)
      ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
      Price / EPS
      ✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)
      Price / (CFO / Shares)
      ✗Dreman< 8x
      Price / Book Value per Share
      ✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)
      Valuation Reasonableness
      ✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
      P/E or FCF Yield
      ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
      P/B or P/E vs. Historical Average
      ✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
      Discount to Intrinsic Value
      ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
      Price / FCF per Share
      ✗Ackman<= 25
      Price vs. Trailing Low100% of trailing low ($0.76)
      ✓Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)
      Net income / market capitalization-321.28%; #5811/6340 (top 91.7%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
      Positive book equity / market capitalization+3.5923; #389/6449 (top 6.0%)
      ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
      Price / Diluted EPS
      ✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)
      (EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E
      ✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)
      Price / Tangible Book Value per Share
      ✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)
      Book Value per Share Change
      ✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)
      Revenue / market capitalization+0.3045; #3301/5247 (top 62.9%)
      ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
      (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization
      ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
      Trailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-83.41%; #5885/6202 (top 94.9%)
      ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    • Cash Flow0% pass✓ 1✗ 11▾

      No clean pass — all 10 investors flag at least one cash flow criterion

      Free Cash Flow Proxy$-31.4M
      ✗BuffettPositive and growing
      FCF Positive and Growing$-23.2M
      ✗LynchPositive and growing
      Operating Cash Flow$-36.6M
      ✗PiotroskiCFO > 0
      (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-42.37%, ROA=-44.34%
      ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
      Price / (CFO / Shares)
      ✗Dreman< 8x
      P/E or FCF Yield
      ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
      FCF Positive0/1 years FCF positive
      ✗MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years
      (OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap
      ✗Ackman>= 4%
      Price / FCF per Share
      ✗Ackman<= 25
      Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency0/3 years positive
      ✗SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years
      Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures
      ✗Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)
      (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization
      ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    • Growth0% pass✓ 3✗ 10▾

      No clean pass — all 8 investors flag at least one growth criterion

      EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
      ✗Graham>= 33% growth
      Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
      ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
      3-5 Year EPS CAGR
      ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
      Inventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthN/A (no inventory)
      ✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
      EPS Growth Direction
      ✗DremanPositive over recent years
      EPS CAGR
      ✗Dreman> 5% annualized
      Positive Net Income Frequency0/3 years positive
      ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
      3yr Median Revenue Growth558.3%
      ✓Ackman>= 5%
      Positive EPS Growth Frequency
      ✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
      5-Year EPS CAGR
      ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
      Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 100.0% -> 1.1%, operating margin -11796.1% -> -1050.6%
      ✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
      5-year Revenue CAGR
      ✗SleepCAGR > 7%
      3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR
      ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
    • Profitability6% pass✓ 4✗ 31▾

      15 of 16 flag RADX's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +12 more

      Positive EPS (10 years)0/4 years positive
      ✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
      EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
      ✗Graham>= 33% growth
      Net Income Positive (10+ years)0/4 years positive
      ✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
      ROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)-113.6%
      ✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)
      Operating Margin (10-yr trend)
      ✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
      Free Cash Flow Proxy$-31.4M
      ✗BuffettPositive and growing
      Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)
      ✗BuffettCoV < 0.3
      Retained Earnings Effectiveness
      ✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
      Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
      ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
      3-5 Year EPS CAGR
      ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
      ROE-89.4%
      ✗Lynch> 15%
      EBIT / Enterprise ValueN/A (EV <= 0)
      ✗Greenblatt> 10%
      Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=N/A (EV <= 0), ROC=N/A (invested capital <= 0)
      ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
      Net Income / Total Assets-44.34%
      ✗PiotroskiROA > 0
      ROA Change YoY-66.56% -> -44.34% (delta: +22.23%)
      ✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
      (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-42.37%, ROA=-44.34%
      ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
      Gross Margin Change YoY100.0% -> 1.1%
      ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
      Pre-Tax Income / Revenue-1052.4%
      ✗Dreman>= 8%
      Net Income / Shareholders' Equity-89.4%
      ✗Dreman> 12%
      Margin of Safety
      ✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15
      Return on Equity-113.6% (3-yr avg)
      ✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
      Discount to Intrinsic Value
      ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
      Positive Net Income Frequency0/3 years positive
      ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
      Operating Income / Revenue-1050.6%
      ✗Ackman>= 15%
      Net Income / Shareholders Equity-89.4%
      ✗Ackman>= 15%
      5-Year EPS CAGR
      ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
      Operating Margin Trend-11796.1% (2022) -> -1050.6% (2024)
      ✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 years
      Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 100.0% -> 1.1%, operating margin -11796.1% -> -1050.6%
      ✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
      Net income / market capitalization-321.28%; #5811/6340 (top 91.7%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
      Gross profit / total assets+0.05%; #3459/3702 (top 93.4%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
      Net income / positive book equity-89.43%; #4534/5226 (top 86.8%)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
      Negative 5-year standard deviation of ROA
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
      3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR
      ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
      Positive Diluted-EPS Years
      ✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)
    • Verdicts7% pass✓ 1✗ 13▾

      Split decision: 13 FAIL · 2 NEUTRAL · 1 PASS

      Overall verdict
      ✗GrahamFAIL (1/9)✗BuffettFAIL (0/9)✗LynchFAIL (1/7)•GreenblattNot ranked✓PiotroskiPASS (F-Score 5)✗DremanFAIL (1/11)✗MungerFAIL (1/4)✗PabraiFAIL (0/3)✗AkreFAIL (0/6)✗MarksFAIL (0/5)✗AckmanFAIL (1/9)✗TempletonFAIL (3/8)✗SleepFAIL (1/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗NeffFAIL (0/6)✗SchlossFAIL (1/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked)
    • Debt & Leverage8% pass✓ 3✗ 12▾

      11 of 12 flag RADX's debt & leverage — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +8 more

      LT Debt vs Net Current Assets
      ✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
      Debt/Equity & Interest Coverage
      ✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
      Total Debt / Equity
      ✗Lynch< 0.33
      Cash - Long-term Debt
      ✗LynchPositive preferred
      LT Debt / Total Assets Change0.00% -> 0.00%
      ✓PiotroskiDecreased YoY
      Current Assets / Current Liabilities2.67
      ✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)
      Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity
      ✗Dreman< 0.8✗Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✗SchlossD/E < 1.00x
      Debt Levels
      ✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3
      Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=-584.6x, D/EBITDA=N/A
      ✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
      Total Debt / Shareholders Equity
      ✗Ackman<= 1.0
      Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)
      ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    • Efficiency38% pass✓ 4✗ 7▾

      5 of 8 flag RADX's efficiency — Buffett, Greenblatt, Munger +2 more

      Current Ratio2.67
      ✓Graham>= 2.0
      ROIC (3-5 yr avg)
      ✗Buffett> 10%
      ROIC - WACC
      ✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
      EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)N/A (invested capital <= 0)
      ✗Greenblatt> 25%
      Current Ratio Change YoY1.30 -> 2.67
      ✓PiotroskiIncreased YoY
      Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.00x -> 0.04x
      ✓PiotroskiImproved YoY
      Current Assets / Current Liabilities2.67
      ✓Dreman> 1.5
      Return on Invested Capital
      ✗Munger> 15%
      ROIC (high and growing)FY2022: ROIC=unavailable; FY2023: ROIC=unavailable; FY2024: ROIC=unavailable
      ✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in each
      Reinvestment Rate x ROIC
      ✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
      ROIC (5-year)
      ✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years

    Business & financials

    Financial snapshot: annual FY 2024. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.

    Company Profile

    Industry: Pharmaceutical Products
    SIC Sector: Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals
    Size: Micro Cap($11.9M)
    Revenue: $3.6M+1114.3% YoY
    Net Income: $38.3M+20.0% YoY

    Financial Snapshot

    Operating Margin-1050.6%
    Return on Equity-89.4%
    Debt / Equity--
    Current Ratio2.67
    EPS (Diluted)$-1.76

    Company Financials

    Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years

    TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.

    MetricFY 2024
    Sources
    • 20-F · 2025-09-18
    FY 2023
    Sources
    • 20-F · 2025-09-18
    FY 2022
    Sources
    • 20-F · 2025-09-18
    FY 2021
    Sources
    • 20-F · 2025-09-18
    Market Cap$11.9Mcurrent$2.1Best.----
    Revenue$3.6M↑1114%$299.2K↑2%$292.4K--
    Operating Income-$38.2M↑19%-$47.2M↓37%-$34.5M--
    Net Income-$38.3M↑20%-$47.9M↓39%-$34.6M--
    EPS (Diluted)$-1.76↑86%$-12.41↓10%$-11.32--
    Gross Margin1.1%↓99%100.0%100.0%—
    Operating Margin-1050.6%↑93%-15777.2%↓34%-11796.1%—
    ROE-89.4%↑49%-175.3%↓131%-75.9%—
    Total Debt--------
    Shareholders' Equity$42.9M↑57%$27.4M↓40%$45.6M↓28%$63.0M
    Current Ratio2.67↑105%1.30——
    Debt / Equity————
    Operating Cash Flow-$36.6M↓59%-$23.0M↑1%-$23.2M--
    Free Cash Flow-----$23.2M--

    Score history

    Historical Score Timeline

    Industry peers

    Industry Peers

    Similar companies in Pharmaceutical Products

    RADX vs Peers — Financial Grading

    Revenue$3.6MBottom 25%
    Net Income$38.3MBottom 25%
    ROE-89.4%Bottom 25%
    D/E—
    Op. Margin-1050.6%Bottom 25%
    Curr. Ratio2.67Median
    CompanyMarket CapPriceRevenueNet IncomeROED/EOp. MarginCurr. RatioGrahamBuffettLynchGreenblattPiotroskiDreman
    Merck & Co., Inc.MRK$364.3B$147.76$65.0B$18.3B34.7%0.94—1.542/95/94/70/3F-Score 41/11
    ABBOTT LABORATORIESABT$188.0B$108.52$44.3B$6.5B12.5%0.2518.2%1.583/94/92/71/3F-Score 53/11
    BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB COBMY$129.7B$63.43$48.2B$7.1B38.2%2.4419.4%1.262/91/93/71/3F-Score 85/11
    BIO-TECHNE CorpTECH$11.4B$72.80$1.2B$73.4M3.8%—8.4%3.464/93/93/70/3F-Score 54/11
    REPLIGEN CORPRGEN$10.7B$167.79$738.3M$48.9M2.3%0.267.5%8.373/92/93/70/3F-Score 75/11
    IONIS PHARMACEUTICALS INCIONS$4.8B$29.06$943.7M$381.4M-78.0%3.60-40.4%3.833/91/91/70/3F-Score 43/11
    NEOGEN CORPNEOG$2.5B$11.23$870.4M$7.9M-0.4%0.76-2.5%3.823/91/92/70/3F-Score 64/11
    Pharvaris N.V.PHVS$2.4B$33.36—$206.4M-64.8%0.00——0/90/92/70/3F-Score 22/11