SOLENO THERAPEUTICS INC
SLNOInvestment snapshot
Positive
3
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
2 / 11
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
$6.92
-86.8% vs price
Models with upside
0 / 17
Positive margin of safety
Strongest signal
11 of 12 pass — Asness objects
Key risk
No clean pass — all 13 investors flag at least one valuation criterion
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.
| Metric | Graham Defensive Value | Buffett Quality Compounder | Lynch GARP | Greenblatt Magic Formula | Piotroski F-Score | Dreman Contrarian Value | Munger Quality Focus | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Ackman Activist Value | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Asness Systematic Factors | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL · Rank #980 (Top 31.6%) | PASS | PASS | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | PASS | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL |
| Score | |||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… |
| Intrinsic Value (annual) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||
| Margin of Safety | -505.6% | -920.0% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | -353.3% | -1504.6% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Financial Basis | TTM ended 2026-03-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-03-31 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-05-07 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-03-31 Latest source filing: 2026-05-07 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-03-31 · TTM ended 2026-03-31 vs 2025-03-31 · TTM ended 2026-03-31 Latest source filing: 2026-05-07 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-03-31 Latest source filing: 2026-05-07 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-25 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-03-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-03-31 · Market data at 2026-04-10 Latest source filing: 2026-05-07 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-03-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-03-31 Latest source filing: 2026-05-07 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-25 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · TTM ended 2026-03-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-03-31 Latest source filing: 2026-05-07 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-03-31 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-05-07 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-03-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-03-31 · Market data at 2026-04-10 Latest source filing: 2026-05-07 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-04-10 · Balance sheet at 2026-03-31 Latest source filing: 2026-05-07 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-02-25 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-03-31 · Balance sheet at 2026-03-31 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-04-10 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-05-07 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-03-31 Latest source filing: 2026-05-07 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-03-31 Latest source filing: 2026-05-07 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-03-31 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-04-10 Latest source filing: 2026-05-07 Score computed: 2026-11-14 |
Where It Passes
- Debt & Leverage92% pass✓ 14✗ 1▾
11 of 12 pass — Asness objects
LT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $49.9M vs NCA $268.3M✓GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current AssetsDebt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.10, IC: 16.0x✓BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xTotal Debt / Equity0.10✓Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt$83.2M✓LynchPositive preferredLT Debt / Total Assets Change15.06% -> 8.84%✓PiotroskiDecreased YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities5.62✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0.10✓Dreman< 0.8✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓SchlossD/E < 1.00xDebt Levels0.10✓MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✓AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=16.0x, D/EBITDA=0.6x✓MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xTotal Debt / Shareholders Equity0.10✓Ackman<= 1.0Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-0.1006; #1284/4210 (top 30.5%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
Where It Falls Short
- Valuation0% pass✓ 1✗ 27▾
No clean pass — all 13 investors flag at least one valuation criterion
Price / 3-yr avg EPS✗Graham<= 15xPrice-to-Book Ratio6.0x✗Graham<= 1.5xP/E x P/B✗Graham<= 22.5Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 134.9x (growth N/A)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)EBIT / Enterprise Value3.2%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=3.2%, ROC=63.8%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Price / EPS134.9x✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)Price / (CFO / Shares)58.1x✗Dreman< 8xPrice / Book Value per Share6.0x✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=134.9x, OE Yield=0.8%✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%P/E or FCF YieldP/E=134.9x, FCF Yield=1.7%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=134.9x, P/B=6.0x✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePrice / FCF per Share58.1x✗Ackman<= 25Price vs. Trailing Low✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)Net income / market capitalization+3.49%; #2213/6340 (top 34.9%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionPositive book equity / market capitalization+0.1802; #4291/6449 (top 66.5%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionPrice / Diluted EPS134.9x✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / Tangible Book Value per Share6.10x✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change+1426.1%✓SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Revenue / market capitalization+0.1036; #4320/5247 (top 82.3%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+3.83%; #1838/4519 (top 40.7%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Growth0% pass✓ 1✗ 12▾
No clean pass — all 8 investors flag at least one growth criterion
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 134.9x (growth N/A)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passInventory Growth vs Revenue Growth✗LynchInventory growth < Revenue growthEPS Growth Direction✗DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR✗Dreman> 5% annualizedPositive Net Income Frequency1/13 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years3yr Median Revenue Growth✗Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency3/5 years with positive EPS growth✓AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trend✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR✗SleepCAGR > 7%3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR✗Neff7%-20% annualized - Valuation models0% pass✗ 4▾
SLNO overvalued: all 4 models price fair value below $52.63 (median $6.92)
Graham fair value$8.69✗Graham-505.6% margin vs $52.63Buffett fair value$5.16✗Buffett-920.0% margin vs $52.63Munger fair value$11.61✗Munger-353.3% margin vs $52.63Pabrai fair value$3.28✗Pabrai-1504.6% margin vs $52.63 - Profitability13% pass✓ 11✗ 24▾
14 of 16 flag SLNO's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +11 more
Positive EPS (10 years)1/14 years positive✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthNet Income Positive (10+ years)1/14 years positive✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)-99.6%✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)4.9% (latest)✓BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy$22.8M✓BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)✗BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 134.9x (growth N/A)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROE19.4%✓Lynch> 15%EBIT / Enterprise Value3.2%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=3.2%, ROC=63.8%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Net Income / Total Assets3.71%✓PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY-53.13% -> 3.71% (delta: +56.84%)✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=8.30%, ROA=3.71%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAGross Margin Change YoY✗PiotroskiImproved YoYPre-Tax Income / Revenue11.0%✓Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity19.4%✓Dreman> 12%Margin of SafetyP/E=134.9x, P/B=6.0x✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15Return on Equity-30.6% (3-yr avg)✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency1/13 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsOperating Income / Revenue30.3%✓Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity19.4%✓Ackman>= 15%5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend✗TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trend✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holdingNet income / market capitalization+3.49%; #2213/6340 (top 34.9%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionGross profit / total assets+33.29%; #1262/3702 (top 34.1%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / positive book equity+19.37%; #825/5226 (top 15.8%)✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNegative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.3670; #4750/5884 (top 80.7%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR✗Neff7%-20% annualizedPositive Diluted-EPS Years1/10 years positive✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule) - Verdicts20% pass✓ 3✗ 12▾
Split decision: 11 FAIL · 3 PASS · 2 NEUTRAL
Overall verdict✗GrahamFAIL (3/9)✗BuffettFAIL (3/9)✗LynchFAIL (4/7)✗GreenblattRank #980✓PiotroskiPASS (F-Score 5)✓DremanPASS (5/11)✗MungerFAIL (1/4)✗PabraiFAIL (0/3)✗AkreFAIL (2/6)✗MarksFAIL (1/5)✓AckmanPASS (5/9)✗TempletonFAIL (2/8)✗SleepFAIL (1/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗NeffFAIL (1/6)✗SchlossFAIL (3/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked) - Efficiency38% pass✓ 3✗ 8▾
5 of 8 flag SLNO's efficiency — Buffett, Piotroski, Munger +2 more
Current Ratio5.62✓Graham>= 2.0ROIC (3-5 yr avg)-34.9%✗Buffett> 10%ROIC - WACC-44.9%✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)63.8%✓Greenblatt> 25%Current Ratio Change YoY15.68 -> 5.80✗PiotroskiIncreased YoYRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY✗PiotroskiImproved YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities5.62✓Dreman> 1.5Return on Invested Capital12.5%✗Munger> 15%ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=unavailable; FY2024: ROIC=-50.3%; FY2025: ROIC=1.5%✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROIC1.5% (RR=100% x ROIC=1.5%)✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%ROIC (5-year)0/3 years above 12% (latest 1.5%)✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years - Cash Flow40% pass✓ 5✗ 7▾
6 of 10 flag SLNO's cash flow — Dreman, Pabrai, Marks +3 more
Free Cash Flow Proxy$22.8M✓BuffettPositive and growingFCF Positive and Growing$105.4M✓LynchPositive and growingOperating Cash Flow$46.8M✓PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=8.30%, ROA=3.71%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAPrice / (CFO / Shares)58.1x✗Dreman< 8xP/E or FCF YieldP/E=134.9x, FCF Yield=1.7%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%FCF Positive1/13 years FCF positive✗MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap3.9%✗Ackman>= 4%Price / FCF per Share58.1x✗Ackman<= 25Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency1/13 years positive✗SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available yearsOperating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$105.4M✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+3.83%; #1838/4519 (top 40.7%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
Business & financials
Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2025
Issued 12.6% of shares last year, 63.0% issued over two.
- Buybacks
- $100.1M
- Dividends
- —
Company Financials
Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years
TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.
The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.
| Metric | TTM · 2026-03-31 2025-04-01 – 2026-03-31 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, capex, revenue, net income, operating income, ebit, interest expense, depreciation amortization. | Q1 FY 2026 2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 Sources | FY 2025Sources
| FY 2024Sources
| FY 2023Sources
| FY 2022Sources
| FY 2021Sources
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.8Bcurrent | -- | $2.0Best. | $2.3Best. | $1.5Best. | $23.8Mest. | $28.4Mest. |
| Revenue | $285.0M | $94.6M | $190.4M | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Operating Income | $86.4M↑141% | $31.3M↑168% | $9.4M↑105% | -$187.7M↓353% | -$41.4M↓70% | -$24.4M↑23% | -$31.5M |
| Net Income | $96.0M↑148% | $31.4M↑172% | $20.9M↑112% | -$175.8M↓351% | -$39.0M↓62% | -$24.1M↑22% | -$30.9M |
| EPS (Diluted) | -- | $0.59↑162% | $0.39↑109% | $-4.38↓86% | $-2.36↑18% | $-2.87↑51% | $-5.81 |
| Gross Margin | — | — | 98.6% | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 30.3% | 33.1% | 4.9% | — | — | — | — |
| ROE | 19.4%↑123% | — | 4.6%↑106% | -71.7%↓190% | -24.8%↑89% | -232.6%↓34% | -173.7% |
| Total Debt | $49.9M | $49.9M | $49.9M | $49.8M | -- | -- | $0 |
| Shareholders' Equity | $495.8M↑113% | $495.8M↑113% | $450.1M↑84% | $245.1M↑56% | $157.5M↑1422% | $10.3M↓42% | $17.8M |
| Current Ratio | 5.62↓71% | 5.62↓71% | 5.80↓63% | 15.68↑5% | 14.89↑596% | 2.14↓24% | 2.80 |
| Debt / Equity | 0.10↓53% | 0.10↓53% | 0.11↓46% | 0.20 | — | — | 0.00 |
| Operating Cash Flow | $105.5M↑218% | $26.0M↑179% | $46.8M↑168% | -$69.1M↓177% | -$24.9M↓20% | -$20.8M↑25% | -$27.8M |
| Free Cash Flow | $105.4M↑218% | $25.9M↑179% | $46.7M↑167% | -$69.3M↓178% | -$24.9M↓20% | -$20.8M↑25% | -$27.8M |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Pharmaceutical Products
SLNO vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Greenblatt | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Merck & Co., Inc.MRK | $364.3B | $147.76 | $65.0B | $18.3B | 34.7% | 0.94 | — | 1.54 | 2/9 | 5/9 | 4/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 4 | 1/11 |
| ABBOTT LABORATORIESABT | $188.0B | $108.52 | $44.3B | $6.5B | 12.5% | 0.25 | 18.2% | 1.58 | 3/9 | 4/9 | 2/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 5 | 3/11 |
| BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB COBMY | $129.7B | $63.43 | $48.2B | $7.1B | 38.2% | 2.44 | 19.4% | 1.26 | 2/9 | 1/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 8 | 5/11 |
| BIO-TECHNE CorpTECH | $11.4B | $72.80 | $1.2B | $73.4M | 3.8% | — | 8.4% | 3.46 | 4/9 | 3/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 5 | 4/11 |
| REPLIGEN CORPRGEN | $10.7B | $167.79 | $738.3M | $48.9M | 2.3% | 0.26 | 7.5% | 8.37 | 3/9 | 2/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 7 | 5/11 |
| IONIS PHARMACEUTICALS INCIONS | $4.8B | $29.06 | $943.7M | $381.4M | -78.0% | 3.60 | -40.4% | 3.83 | 3/9 | 1/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 4 | 3/11 |
| NEOGEN CORPNEOG | $2.5B | $11.23 | $870.4M | $7.9M | -0.4% | 0.76 | -2.5% | 3.82 | 3/9 | 1/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 4/11 |
| Pharvaris N.V.PHVS | $2.4B | $33.36 | — | $206.4M | -64.8% | 0.00 | — | — | 0/9 | 0/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 2 | 2/11 |