SunocoCorp LLC
SUNCAbout the company
SunocoCorp LLC engages in energy infrastructure and distribution of motor fuels in North America, the Greater Caribbean, and Europe. It operates through four segments: Fuel Distribution, Pipeline Systems, Terminals, and Refinery. Its midstream operations include a network of approximately 14,000 miles of pipeline and 160 terminals.
Investment snapshot
Positive
2
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
2 / 12
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
$127.35
+93.0% vs price
Models with upside
2 / 17
Positive margin of safety
Strongest signal
SUNC undervalued: all 2 models price fair value above $66.00 (median $127.35)
Key risk
All 8 investors flag SUNC's growth
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.
| Metric | Graham Defensive Value | Buffett Quality Compounder | Lynch GARP | Greenblatt Magic Formula | Piotroski F-Score | Dreman Contrarian Value | Munger Quality Focus | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Ackman Activist Value | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Asness Systematic Factors | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL · Rank #1395 (Top 45%) | PASS | FAIL | PASS | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL |
| Score | |||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… |
| Intrinsic Value (annual) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
| Margin of Safety | N/A | N/A | N/A | +45.3% | N/A | N/A | N/A | +50.8% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Financial Basis | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-19 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-19 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-19 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-19 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-02-19 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-11-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-02-19 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-11-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-02-19 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 Latest source filing: 2026-11-05 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-11-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-02-19 Score computed: 2026-11-14 |
Where It Passes
- Valuation models100% pass✓ 2▾
SUNC undervalued: all 2 models price fair value above $66.00 (median $127.35)
Greenblatt fair value$120.68✓Greenblatt+45.3% margin vs $66.00Pabrai fair value$134.02✓Pabrai+50.8% margin vs $66.00
Where It Falls Short
- Growth0% pass✗ 13▾
All 8 investors flag SUNC's growth
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passInventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: 123.1% vs Rev: 11.1%✗LynchInventory growth < Revenue growthEPS Growth Direction✗DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR✗Dreman> 5% annualizedPositive Net Income Frequency0/3 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years3yr Median Revenue Growth4.7%✗Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 5.9% -> 11.1%, operating margin 2.8% -> 3.7%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR4.5%✗SleepCAGR > 7%3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR✗Neff7%-20% annualized - Efficiency0% pass✓ 1✗ 10▾
No clean pass — all 8 investors flag at least one efficiency criterion
Current Ratio1.28✗Graham>= 2.0ROIC (3-5 yr avg)6.7%✗Buffett> 10%ROIC - WACC-3.3%✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)6.7%✗Greenblatt> 25%Current Ratio Change YoY1.27 -> 1.38✓PiotroskiIncreased YoYRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY1.58x -> 0.89x✗PiotroskiImproved YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities1.28✗Dreman> 1.5Return on Invested Capital4.6%✗Munger> 15%ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=unavailable; FY2024: ROIC=8.3%; FY2025: ROIC=4.6%✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROICN/A (non-positive net income)✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%ROIC (5-year)0/2 years above 12% (latest 4.6%)✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years - Profitability6% pass✓ 4✗ 31▾
15 of 16 flag SUNC's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +12 more
Positive EPS (10 years)0/3 years positive✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthNet Income Positive (10+ years)0/3 years positive✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)-0.2%✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy✗BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)✗BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROE-0.2%✗Lynch> 15%EBIT / Enterprise Value5.9%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=5.9%, ROC=6.7%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Net Income / Total Assets-0.02%✗PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY0.00% -> -0.02% (delta: -0.02%)✗PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=4.20%, ROA=-0.02%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAGross Margin Change YoY9.2% -> 11.1%✓PiotroskiImproved YoYPre-Tax Income / Revenue✗Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity-0.2%✗Dreman> 12%Margin of SafetyP/B=1.3x✓PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15Return on Equity-0.2% (3-yr avg)✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency0/3 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsOperating Income / Revenue3.7%✗Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity-0.2%✗Ackman>= 15%5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend2.8% (2023) -> 3.7% (2025)✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 5.9% -> 11.1%, operating margin 2.8% -> 3.7%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holdingNet income / market capitalization-0.15%; #3236/6340 (top 51.0%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionGross profit / total assets+9.84%; #2814/3702 (top 76.0%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / positive book equity-0.20%; #2934/5226 (top 56.1%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNegative 5-year standard deviation of ROA✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR✗Neff7%-20% annualizedPositive Diluted-EPS Years✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule) - Debt & Leverage8% pass✓ 1✗ 14▾
11 of 12 flag SUNC's debt & leverage — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +8 more
LT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $13.4B vs NCA $1.5B✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current AssetsDebt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 5.28, IC: 1.7x✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xTotal Debt / Equity5.15✗Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt$-12.5B✗LynchPositive preferredLT Debt / Total Assets Change52.06% -> 47.15%✓PiotroskiDecreased YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities1.28✗Dreman> 1.5✗SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity5.15✗Dreman< 0.8✗Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✗SchlossD/E < 1.00xDebt Levels5.15✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=1.7x, D/EBITDA=8.2x✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xTotal Debt / Shareholders Equity5.15✗Ackman<= 1.0Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-5.1458; #4077/4210 (top 96.8%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section - Valuation8% pass✓ 6✗ 22▾
12 of 13 flag SUNC's valuation — Graham, Lynch, Greenblatt +9 more
Price / Book Value per Share1.3x✗Dreman< 1.2x✓Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)Price / 3-yr avg EPS✗Graham<= 15xPrice-to-Book Ratio1.3x✓Graham<= 1.5xP/E x P/B✗Graham<= 22.5Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)EBIT / Enterprise Value5.9%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=5.9%, ROC=6.7%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Price / EPS✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)Price / (CFO / Shares)2.9x✓Dreman< 8xValuation ReasonablenessOE Yield=20.1%✓MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%P/E or FCF Yield✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/B=1.3x✓MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePrice / FCF per Share✗Ackman<= 25Price vs. Trailing Low134% of trailing low ($49.28)✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)Net income / market capitalization-0.15%; #3236/6340 (top 51.0%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionPositive book equity / market capitalization+0.7523; #2050/6449 (top 31.8%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionPrice / Diluted EPS✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / Tangible Book Value per ShareN/A (non-positive TBVPS)✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Revenue / market capitalization+7.4118; #404/5247 (top 7.7%)✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date+7.13%; #2018/6202 (top 32.5%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Verdicts13% pass✓ 2✗ 13▾
Split decision: 12 FAIL · 2 PASS · 2 NEUTRAL
Overall verdict✗GrahamFAIL (2/9)✗BuffettFAIL (0/9)✗LynchFAIL (0/7)✗GreenblattRank #1395✓PiotroskiPASS (F-Score 5)✗DremanFAIL (3/11)✓MungerPASS (2/4)✗PabraiFAIL (1/3)✗AkreFAIL (0/6)✗MarksFAIL (1/5)✗AckmanFAIL (1/9)✗TempletonFAIL (3/8)✗SleepFAIL (1/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗NeffFAIL (1/6)✗SchlossFAIL (1/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked) - Cash Flow30% pass✓ 4✗ 8▾
7 of 10 flag SUNC's cash flow — Buffett, Lynch, Pabrai +4 more
Free Cash Flow Proxy✗BuffettPositive and growingFCF Positive and Growing✗LynchPositive and growingOperating Cash Flow$1.2B✓PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=4.20%, ROA=-0.02%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAPrice / (CFO / Shares)2.9x✓Dreman< 8xP/E or FCF Yield✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%FCF Positive✗MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap✗Ackman>= 4%Price / FCF per Share✗Ackman<= 25Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency3/3 years positive✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available yearsOperating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures✗Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
Business & financials
Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2025
Share retirement not available for this company.
- Buybacks
- —
- Dividends
- $126.0M
Company Financials
Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years
TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.
The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.
| Metric | Q3 FY 2026 2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow. | Q2 FY 2026 2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow. | Q1 FY 2026 2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 Sources | FY 2025Sources
| FY 2024Sources
| FY 2023Sources
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.4Bcurrent | -- | -- | $2.7Best. | -- | -- |
| Revenue | $18.0B | $14.3B | $10.7B | $25.2B↑11% | $22.7B↓2% | $23.1B |
| Operating Income | $740.0M | $583.0M | $866.0M | $935.0M↑18% | $791.0M↑25% | $635.0M |
| Net Income | $81.0M | $39.0M | $110.0M | -$5.0M | $0 | $0 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.55 | $0.76 | $2.13 | $-0.10 | -- | -- |
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | 11.1%↑20% | 9.2%↑56% | 5.9% |
| Operating Margin | 4.1% | 4.1% | 8.1% | 3.7%↑6% | 3.5%↑27% | 2.8% |
| ROE | — | — | — | -0.2% | — | — |
| Total Debt | $13.2B | $13.3B | $13.9B | $13.4B↑79% | $7.5B | -- |
| Shareholders' Equity | $2.6B | $2.5B | $2.6B | $2.5B | $0 | -- |
| Current Ratio | 1.28 | 1.29 | 1.40 | 1.38↑9% | 1.27 | — |
| Debt / Equity | 5.15 | 5.23 | 5.38 | 5.28 | — | — |
| Operating Cash Flow | $696.0M | $1.1B | $454.0M | $1.2B↑117% | $549.0M↓9% | $600.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Petroleum and Natural Gas
SUNC vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Greenblatt | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TotalEnergies SETTE | $199.0B | $90.74 | $201.2B | $13.1B | 11.4% | 0.49 | — | 0.97 | 4/9 | 4/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 4 | 6/11 |
| CONOCOPHILLIPSCOP | $168.2B | $142.28 | $58.9B | $8.0B | 12.4% | 0.36 | — | 1.30 | 2/9 | 3/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 7 | 6/11 |
| BP PLCBP | $117.7B | $45.70 | $192.5B | $55.0M | 0.1% | 1.09 | 6.6% | 1.26 | 1/9 | 3/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 5 | 2/11 |
| SUNCOR ENERGY INCSU | $80.5B | $69.92 | $38.2B | $4.3B | 13.1% | 0.22 | — | 1.39 | 2/9 | 2/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 4 | 6/11 |
| CENOVUS ENERGY INC.CVE | $52.6B | $29.08 | $36.3B | $2.9B | 12.4% | 0.35 | — | 1.57 | 1/9 | 1/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 5 | 5/11 |
| WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTDWDS | $40.1B | $21.08 | $13.0B | $2.7B | 7.6% | 0.33 | 30.0% | 1.59 | 3/9 | 4/9 | 0/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 4 | 7/11 |
| EXPAND ENERGY CorpEXE | $20.4B | $88.53 | $12.1B | $1.8B | 9.8% | 0.27 | 20.4% | 1.01 | 2/9 | 5/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 7 | 7/11 |
| YPF SOCIEDAD ANONIMAYPF | $14.9B | $37.90 | $18.4B | $826.0M | -7.6% | 0.98 | 9.4% | 0.87 | 2/9 | 1/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 4 | 3/11 |