TELEPHONE & DATA SYSTEMS INC /DE/

TDS
About the company

Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., a telecommunications company, provides communications services to residential, commercial, and wholesale customers in the United States. It operates through two segments: TDS Telecom and Array.

Country: United StatesPrice: $31.40Market Cap: $3.4B

Investment snapshot

24%positive consensus
Scored 1d ago

Positive

4

BUY / PASS

Neutral / negative

3 / 9

NEUTRAL / FAIL

Median fair value

$16.49

-47.5% vs price

Models with upside

1 / 17

Positive margin of safety

Strongest signal

8 of 12 pass — Graham, Lynch, Marks +1 more object

Key risk

14 of 16 flag TDS's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +11 more

Framework analysis

VerdictMeaning
BUYPositive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met.
PASSThe company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state.
NEUTRALNeither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position.
FAILThe company does not clear the framework's requirements.
RankedRanked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL.

Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.

MetricGraham

Defensive Value

Buffett

Quality Compounder

Lynch

GARP

Greenblatt

Magic Formula

Piotroski

F-Score

Dreman

Contrarian Value

Munger

Quality Focus

Pabrai

Dhandho Framework

Akre

Three-Legged Stool

Marks

Risk-Aware Value

Ackman

Activist Value

Templeton

Global Bargain Hunter

Sleep

Scale Economies Shared

Asness

Systematic Factors

Neff

Low-P/E Total Return

Schloss

Asset-Value Discipline

O'Shaughnessy

Systematic Factor Composite

VerdictFAILFAILFAILFAIL · Rank #1948 (Top 62.9%)NEUTRALPASSPASSFAILFAILFAILPASSNEUTRALFAILNEUTRALFAILBUYFAIL
Score
AnalysisChecking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…
Intrinsic Value (annual)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Margin of SafetyN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A-69.8%N/A+0.6%-7558.5%-116.7%N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Financial Basis

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-11-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 vs 2025-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-02-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-02-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-02-24

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-11-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-11-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-11-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Where It Passes

  • Debt & Leverage67% pass✓ 11✗ 4▾

    8 of 12 pass — Graham, Lynch, Marks +1 more object

    LT Debt vs Net Current Assets
    ✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
    Debt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.14, IC: 12.4x
    ✓BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
    Total Debt / Equity0.14
    ✓Lynch< 0.33
    Cash - Long-term Debt
    ✗LynchPositive preferred
    LT Debt / Total Assets Change0.00% -> 0.00%
    ✓PiotroskiDecreased YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities4.01
    ✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)
    Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0.14
    ✓Dreman< 0.8✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓SchlossD/E < 1.00x
    Debt Levels0.14
    ✓MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✓AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3
    Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=-0.9x, D/EBITDA=4.0x
    ✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
    Total Debt / Shareholders Equity0.14
    ✓Ackman<= 1.0
    Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-0.1362; #1442/4210 (top 34.3%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section

Where It Falls Short

  • Profitability13% pass✓ 10✗ 25▾

    14 of 16 flag TDS's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +11 more

    Positive EPS (10 years)13/28 years positive
    ✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Net Income Positive (10+ years)23/28 years positive
    ✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
    ROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)-1.3%
    ✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)
    Operating Margin (10-yr trend)-7.9% (latest)
    ✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
    Free Cash Flow Proxy$-93.4M
    ✗BuffettPositive and growing
    Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)3.39
    ✗BuffettCoV < 0.3
    Retained Earnings Effectiveness
    ✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    ROE11.0%
    ✗Lynch> 15%
    EBIT / Enterprise Value-2.8%
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-2.8%, ROC=-3.6%
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Net Income / Total Assets-0.07%
    ✗PiotroskiROA > 0
    ROA Change YoY-0.20% -> -0.07% (delta: +0.13%)
    ✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=7.02%, ROA=-0.07%
    ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Gross Margin Change YoY
    ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Pre-Tax Income / Revenue63.8%
    ✓Dreman>= 8%
    Net Income / Shareholders' Equity11.0%
    ✗Dreman> 12%
    Margin of SafetyP/B=0.7x
    ✓PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15
    Return on Equity-3.4% (3-yr avg)
    ✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
    Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Positive Net Income Frequency23/27 years positive
    ✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    Operating Income / Revenue40.1%
    ✓Ackman>= 15%
    Net Income / Shareholders Equity11.0%
    ✗Ackman>= 15%
    5-Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Operating Margin Trend-50.4% (2023) -> -7.9% (2025)
    ✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 years
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue flat/down, operating margin -50.4% -> -7.9%
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    Net income / market capitalization+15.90%; #348/6340 (top 5.5%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Gross profit / total assets
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Net income / positive book equity+10.95%; #1670/5226 (top 32.0%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Negative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.0263; #1741/5884 (top 29.6%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR20.7% over 5 years
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
    Positive Diluted-EPS Years6/10 years positive
    ✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)
  • Growth13% pass✓ 1✗ 12▾

    7 of 8 flag TDS's growth — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +4 more

    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    Inventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: -21.1% vs Rev: -67.7%
    ✗LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
    EPS Growth Direction$0.76 (2008) -> $-0.65 (2025)
    ✗DremanPositive over recent years
    EPS CAGR2.1% CAGR over 13 years
    ✗Dreman> 5% annualized
    Positive Net Income Frequency23/27 years positive
    ✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    3yr Median Revenue Growth-5.3%
    ✗Ackman>= 5%
    Positive EPS Growth Frequency2/5 years with positive EPS growth
    ✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
    5-Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue flat/down, operating margin -50.4% -> -7.9%
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    5-year Revenue CAGR-25.1%
    ✗SleepCAGR > 7%
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR20.7% over 5 years
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
  • Valuation23% pass✓ 13✗ 15▾

    10 of 13 flag TDS's valuation — Graham, Lynch, Greenblatt +7 more

    Price / 3-yr avg EPS
    ✗Graham<= 15x
    Price-to-Book Ratio0.7x
    ✓Graham<= 1.5x
    P/E x P/B
    ✗Graham<= 22.5
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    EBIT / Enterprise Value-2.8%
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-2.8%, ROC=-3.6%
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Price / EPS
    ✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)
    Price / (CFO / Shares)6.1x
    ✓Dreman< 8x
    Price / Book Value per Share0.7x
    ✓Dreman< 1.2x✓Templeton< 1.5x✓SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)
    Valuation ReasonablenessOE Yield=-2.6%
    ✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
    P/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=5.8%
    ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/B=0.7x
    ✓MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
    Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Price / FCF per Share17.9x
    ✓Ackman<= 25
    Price vs. Trailing Low100% of trailing low ($31.40)
    ✓Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)
    Net income / market capitalization+15.90%; #348/6340 (top 5.5%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Positive book equity / market capitalization+1.4518; #956/6449 (top 14.8%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Price / Diluted EPS
    ✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)
    (EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E
    ✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)
    Price / Tangible Book Value per Share0.99x
    ✓SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)
    Book Value per Share Change+0.1%
    ✓SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)
    Revenue / market capitalization+0.3662; #3043/5247 (top 58.0%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-17.76%; #3473/4519 (top 76.9%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Trailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-19.71%; #3952/6202 (top 63.7%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
  • Valuation models25% pass✓ 1✗ 3▾

    Models split on TDS at $31.40 — fair values range $0.41–$31.60

    Munger fair value$18.49
    ✗Munger-69.8% margin vs $31.40
    Akre fair value$31.60
    ✓Akre+0.6% margin vs $31.40
    Marks fair value$0.41
    ✗Marks-7558.5% margin vs $31.40
    Ackman fair value$14.49
    ✗Ackman-116.7% margin vs $31.40
  • Verdicts29% pass✓ 4✗ 10▾

    Split decision: 9 FAIL · 3 NEUTRAL · 3 PASS · 1 BUY

    Overall verdict
    ✗GrahamFAIL (3/9)✗BuffettFAIL (1/9)✗LynchFAIL (1/7)✗GreenblattRank #1948•PiotroskiNEUTRAL (F-Score 7)✓DremanPASS (6/11)✓MungerPASS (2/4)✗PabraiFAIL (1/3)✗AkreFAIL (1/6)✗MarksFAIL (3/5)✓AckmanPASS (5/9)•TempletonNEUTRAL (6/8)✗SleepFAIL (2/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗NeffFAIL (1/6)✓SchlossBUY (6/7)✗OshaughnessyFAIL (Rank #777/963 (Top 80.7%))
  • Efficiency38% pass✓ 4✗ 7▾

    5 of 8 flag TDS's efficiency — Buffett, Greenblatt, Munger +2 more

    Current Ratio4.01
    ✓Graham>= 2.0
    ROIC (3-5 yr avg)-1.2%
    ✗Buffett> 10%
    ROIC - WACC-11.2%
    ✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
    EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)-3.6%
    ✗Greenblatt> 25%
    Current Ratio Change YoY1.56 -> 2.10
    ✓PiotroskiIncreased YoY
    Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.09x -> 0.15x
    ✓PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities4.01
    ✓Dreman> 1.5
    Return on Invested Capital7.0%
    ✗Munger> 15%
    ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=-5.8%; FY2024: ROIC=-2.0%; FY2025: ROIC=-1.4%
    ✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in each
    Reinvestment Rate x ROIC5.9% (RR=84% x ROIC=7.0%)
    ✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
    ROIC (5-year)0/5 years above 12% (latest -1.4%)
    ✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years
  • Cash Flow40% pass✓ 6✗ 6▾

    6 of 10 flag TDS's cash flow — Buffett, Lynch, Pabrai +3 more

    Free Cash Flow Proxy$-93.4M
    ✗BuffettPositive and growing
    FCF Positive and Growing$199.4M
    ✗LynchPositive and growing
    Operating Cash Flow$589.9M
    ✓PiotroskiCFO > 0
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=7.02%, ROA=-0.07%
    ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Price / (CFO / Shares)6.1x
    ✓Dreman< 8x
    P/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=5.8%
    ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    FCF Positive13/23 years FCF positive
    ✓MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years
    (OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap-17.1%
    ✗Ackman>= 4%
    Price / FCF per Share17.9x
    ✓Ackman<= 25
    Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency24/24 years positive
    ✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years
    Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$-609.3M
    ✗Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-17.76%; #3473/4519 (top 76.9%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section

Business & financials

Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.

Company Profile

Industry: Communication
SIC Sector: Communications
Size: Mid Cap($3.4B)
Revenue: $1.2B-5.3% YoY
Net Income: $6.2M+77.5% YoY

Financial Snapshot

Operating Margin-7.9%
Return on Equity-0.1%
Debt / Equity0.17
Current Ratio2.10
EPS (Diluted)$-0.65
Buybacks (1y)$108.1M
Buybacks (2y)$108.1M
Shares Retired0.2% / −0.7% 2y

Shareholder Return

Fiscal 2025

Retired 0.2% of shares last year, 0.7% issued over two.

Buybacks
$108.1M
Dividends
$87.7M

Company Financials

Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years

TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.

The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.

MetricTTM · 2026-09-30

2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, operating income, ebit, pre tax income, interest expense, operating cash flow, capex, dividends paid, buybacks.

Q3 FY 2026

2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, capex, dividends paid.

Q2 FY 2026

2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, capex, dividends paid.

Q1 FY 2026

2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31

Sources
FY 2025
Sources
  • 10-K · 2026-02-24
FY 2024
Sources
  • 10-K · 2025-02-21
FY 2023
Sources
  • 10-K · 2024-02-16
FY 2022
Sources
  • 10-K · 2023-02-16
FY 2021
Sources
  • 10-K · 2022-02-17
Market Cap$3.4Bcurrent------$5.1Best.$4.0Best.$2.1Best.$1.4Best.$2.0Best.
Revenue$1.3B↓68%$306.7M↓1%$309.3M↓74%$309.4M↓73%$1.2B↓5%$1.3B↓4%$1.4B↓75%$5.4B↑2%$5.3B
Operating Income$503.8M↑1071%-$30.0M↑56%$373.2M↑833%$143.8M↑311%-$97.4M↑49%-$191.3M↑72%-$682.6M↓659%$122.0M↓53%$261.0M
Net Income$545.3M↑1061%$45.9M↑156%$298.4M↑2386%$144.6M↑1966%-$6.2M↑77%-$27.7M↑94%-$500.0M↓906%$62.0M↓60%$156.0M
EPS (Diluted)--$0.25↑130%$2.42↑4940%$1.09↑1311%$-0.65↑24%$-0.85↑83%$-5.06↓7129%$-0.07↓107%$1.00
Gross Margin—————————
Operating Margin40.1%↑3525%-9.8%↑56%120.7%↑3478%46.5%↑1432%-7.9%↑46%-14.7%↑71%-50.4%↓2335%2.3%↓54%4.9%
ROE11.0%↑962%———-0.1%↑76%-0.5%↑94%-9.6%↓1007%1.1%↓60%2.6%
Total Debt$678.0M↓18%$678.0M↓18%$680.1M↓83%$680.2M↓83%$828.6M↓66%$2.4B↓40%$4.1B↑9%$3.8B↑28%$2.9B
Shareholders' Equity$5.0B↑11%$5.0B↑11%$5.2B↑3%$4.9B↓3%$4.8B↓6%$5.1B↓2%$5.2B↓11%$5.8B↓1%$5.9B
Current Ratio4.01↑112%4.01↑112%3.82↑114%3.43↑97%2.10↑35%1.56↑11%1.40↑5%1.34↓23%1.73
Debt / Equity0.14↓27%0.14↓27%0.13↓84%0.14↓83%0.17↓64%0.48↓39%0.79↑23%0.64↑30%0.50
Operating Cash Flow$34.7M↓96%-$107.9M↓194%$55.6M↓87%$67.5M↓64%$589.9M↓49%$1.1B$1.1B↓1%$1.2B↑5%$1.1B
Free Cash Flow-$609.3M-$305.5M-$113.3M↓143%-$81.6M↓243%$199.4M↓74%$780.4M↑57%$498.1M↑8401%-$6.0M↑79%-$28.0M

Score history

Historical Score Timeline

Industry peers

Industry Peers

Similar companies in Communication

TDS vs Peers — Financial Grading

Revenue$1.2BBottom 25%
Net Income$6.2MBottom 25%
ROE-0.1%Bottom 25%
D/E0.17Top 25%
Op. Margin-7.9%Bottom 25%
Curr. Ratio2.10Top 25%
CompanyMarket CapPriceRevenueNet IncomeROED/EOp. MarginCurr. RatioGrahamBuffettLynchGreenblattPiotroskiDreman
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INCVZ$192.1B$46.36$138.2B$17.2B16.2%1.5021.2%0.914/93/92/71/3F-Score 56/11
AT&T INC.T$149.4B$22.18$125.6B$22.0B17.4%1.0819.2%0.915/92/93/70/3F-Score 66/11
NIPPON TELEGRAPH & TELEPHONE CORPNTTYY$85.0B$26.32——————2/91/92/71/3F-Score 76/11
AMERICA MOVIL SAB DE CV/AMX$76.0B$25.47$42.1B$1.1B6.2%1.5420.7%0.721/95/91/71/3F-Score 62/11
VODAFONE GROUP PUBLIC LTD COVOD$35.6B$15.37$40.5B$4.5B-7.9%1.01-1.1%—1/92/90/70/3F-Score 52/11
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. /MO/CHTR$24.8B$138.39$54.8B$5.0B31.1%5.9023.6%0.394/93/93/70/3F-Score 65/11
BCE INCBCE$20.0B$21.43$17.9B$4.8B28.3%1.52—0.584/91/95/71/3F-Score 69/11
ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INCRCI$18.0B$33.24$15.9B$5.0B38.8%2.2545.2%0.615/95/95/71/3F-Score 48/11