Traws Pharma, Inc.
TRAWAbout the company
Traws Pharma, Inc., a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company, develops small synthetic molecules for respiratory viral diseases and cancer. The company is developing investigational novel therapies for influenza and COVID-19 that are designed to address treatment resistance, such as TRX01 (Ratutrelvir), an inhibitor in development for the treatment of COVID-19; and Tivoxavir marboxil, an endonuclease inhibitor in development for the treatment of bird flu and seasonal influenza.
Investment snapshot
Positive
2
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
3 / 11
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
$7.79
+3018.0% vs price
Models with upside
2 / 17
Positive margin of safety
Strongest signal
TRAW undervalued: all 2 models price fair value above $0.25 (median $7.79)
Key risk
No clean pass — all 8 investors flag at least one efficiency criterion
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.
| Metric | Graham Defensive Value | Buffett Quality Compounder | Lynch GARP | Greenblatt Magic Formula | Piotroski F-Score | Dreman Contrarian Value | Munger Quality Focus | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Ackman Activist Value | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Asness Systematic Factors | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | Not ranked | PASS | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | PASS | FAIL | NEUTRAL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL |
| Score | |||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… | Checking access… |
| Intrinsic Value (annual) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
| Margin of Safety | N/A | +97.1% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | +96.4% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Financial Basis | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30 Latest source filing: 2026-08-14 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-04-15 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-06-30 Latest source filing: 2026-08-14 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-04-15 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-04-15 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-06-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-08-14 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-04-15 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-04-15 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-04-15 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-04-15 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-06-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-08-14 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-04-15 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-04-15 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | TTM ended 2026-06-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-08-14 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-04-15 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-06-30 Latest source filing: 2026-08-14 Score computed: 2026-11-14 | Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-06-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-08-14 Score computed: 2026-11-14 |
Where It Passes
- Valuation models100% pass✓ 2▾
TRAW undervalued: all 2 models price fair value above $0.25 (median $7.79)
Buffett fair value$8.67✓Buffett+97.1% margin vs $0.25Pabrai fair value$6.92✓Pabrai+96.4% margin vs $0.25
Where It Falls Short
- Efficiency0% pass✓ 1✗ 10▾
No clean pass — all 8 investors flag at least one efficiency criterion
Current Ratio0.93✗Graham>= 2.0ROIC (3-5 yr avg)✗Buffett> 10%ROIC - WACC✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)N/A (invested capital <= 0)✗Greenblatt> 25%Current Ratio Change YoY2.16 -> 0.72✗PiotroskiIncreased YoYRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.01x -> 0.26x✓PiotroskiImproved YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities0.93✗Dreman> 1.5Return on Invested Capital✗Munger> 15%ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=unavailable; FY2024: ROIC=unavailable; FY2025: ROIC=unavailable✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROIC✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%ROIC (5-year)✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years - Debt & Leverage8% pass✓ 1✗ 14▾
11 of 12 flag TRAW's debt & leverage — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +8 more
LT Debt vs Net Current Assets✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current AssetsDebt/Equity & Interest Coverage✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xTotal Debt / Equity✗Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt✗LynchPositive preferredLT Debt / Total Assets Change0.00% -> 0.00%✓PiotroskiDecreased YoYCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities0.93✗Dreman> 1.5✗SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity✗Dreman< 0.8✗Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✗SchlossD/E < 1.00xDebt Levels✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDA✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xTotal Debt / Shareholders Equity✗Ackman<= 1.0Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section - Profitability13% pass✓ 7✗ 28▾
14 of 16 flag TRAW's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +11 more
Positive EPS (10 years)1/16 years positive✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthNet Income Positive (10+ years)1/16 years positive✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)-174.6%✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)-640.7% (latest)✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy$6.7M✓BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)✗BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 0.3x (growth N/A)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROE-1275.3%✗Lynch> 15%EBIT / Enterprise Value-47746.9%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-47746.9%, ROC=N/A (invested capital <= 0)✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Net Income / Total Assets86.37%✓PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY-667.11% -> 86.37% (delta: +753.48%)✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-171.28%, ROA=86.37%✗PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAGross Margin Change YoY✗PiotroskiImproved YoYPre-Tax Income / Revenue328.7%✓Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity-1275.3%✗Dreman> 12%Margin of SafetyP/E=0.3x✓PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15Return on Equity-93.2% (3-yr avg)✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency1/15 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsOperating Income / Revenue-640.7%✗Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity-1275.3%✗Ackman>= 15%5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend-8981.4% (2023) -> -640.7% (2025)✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue up, operating margin -8981.4% -> -640.7%✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holdingNet income / market capitalization-559.08%; #5947/6340 (top 93.8%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionGross profit / total assets✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / positive book equity-1275.34%; #5176/5226 (top 99.0%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionNegative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-2.6558; #5508/5884 (top 93.6%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR✗Neff7%-20% annualizedPositive Diluted-EPS Years1/10 years positive✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule) - Growth13% pass✓ 3✗ 10▾
7 of 8 flag TRAW's growth — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +4 more
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growthBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 0.3x (growth N/A)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passInventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthN/A (no inventory)✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growthEPS Growth Direction✗DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR✗Dreman> 5% annualizedPositive Net Income Frequency1/15 years positive✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years3yr Median Revenue Growth0.0%✗Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years5-Year EPS CAGR✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue up, operating margin -8981.4% -> -640.7%✓SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR64.6%✓SleepCAGR > 7%3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR✗Neff7%-20% annualized - Valuation15% pass✓ 7✗ 21▾
11 of 13 flag TRAW's valuation — Graham, Lynch, Greenblatt +8 more
Price / 3-yr avg EPS✗Graham<= 15xPrice-to-Book Ratio✗Graham<= 1.5xP/E x P/B✗Graham<= 22.5Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 0.3x (growth N/A)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)EBIT / Enterprise Value-47746.9%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-47746.9%, ROC=N/A (invested capital <= 0)✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Price / EPS0.3x✓Dreman< 12x✓Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)✗Dreman< 8xPrice / Book Value per ShareN/A (negative BVPS)✗Dreman< 1.2x✗Templeton< 1.5x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=0.3x, OE Yield=293.2%✓MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%P/E or FCF YieldP/E=0.3x, FCF Yield=-538.4%✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=0.3x✓MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePrice / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)✗Ackman<= 25Price vs. Trailing Low100% of trailing low ($0.25)✓Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)Net income / market capitalization-559.08%; #5947/6340 (top 93.8%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionPositive book equity / market capitalization+0.4384; #3105/6449 (top 48.1%)✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-sectionPrice / Diluted EPS0.3x✓NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / Tangible Book Value per ShareN/A (non-positive TBVPS)✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Revenue / market capitalization+0.7233; #2162/5247 (top 41.2%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-538.44%; #4352/4519 (top 96.3%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-83.11%; #5873/6202 (top 94.7%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section - Verdicts15% pass✓ 2✗ 11▾
Split decision: 11 FAIL · 3 NEUTRAL · 2 PASS
Overall verdict✗GrahamFAIL (0/9)✗BuffettFAIL (1/9)✗LynchFAIL (1/7)•GreenblattNot ranked✓PiotroskiPASS (F-Score 4)✗DremanFAIL (2/11)✗MungerFAIL (1/4)•PabraiNEUTRAL (2/3)✗AkreFAIL (0/6)✗MarksFAIL (1/5)✗AckmanFAIL (1/9)✓TempletonPASS (4/8)✗SleepFAIL (2/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗NeffFAIL (2/6)✗SchlossFAIL (0/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked) - Cash Flow20% pass✓ 2✗ 10▾
8 of 10 flag TRAW's cash flow — Lynch, Piotroski, Dreman +5 more
Free Cash Flow Proxy$6.7M✓BuffettPositive and growingFCF Positive and Growing$-20.8M✗LynchPositive and growingOperating Cash Flow$-18.2M✗PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-171.28%, ROA=86.37%✗PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAPrice / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)✗Dreman< 8xP/E or FCF YieldP/E=0.3x, FCF Yield=-538.4%✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%FCF Positive1/9 years FCF positive✗MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap-916.2%✗Ackman>= 4%Price / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)✗Ackman<= 25Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency1/15 years positive✗SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available yearsOperating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$-20.8M✗Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-538.44%; #4352/4519 (top 96.3%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
Business & financials
Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2025
Issued 148.4% of shares last year, 56.8% over two.
- Buybacks
- —
- Dividends
- —
Company Financials
Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years
TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.
The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.
| Metric | TTM · 2026-06-30 2025-07-01 – 2026-06-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: revenue, operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, net income, operating income, ebit, capex. | Q2 FY 2026 2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30 Sources · derived quarter valuesDerived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization. | Q1 FY 2026 2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 Sources | FY 2025Sources
| FY 2024Sources
| FY 2023Sources
| FY 2022Sources
| FY 2021Sources
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.9Mcurrent | -- | -- | $19.1Mest. | $26.6Mest. | $357.1Mest. | $655.3Mest. | $1.0Best. |
| Revenue | -- | -- | -- | $2.8M↑1135% | $226.0K | $226.0K | $226.0K | $226.0K |
| Operating Income | -$21.5M↓6% | -$3.2M↓154% | -$6.9M↓33% | -$17.9M↑87% | -$142.4M↓601% | -$20.3M↓3% | -$19.6M↓19% | -$16.5M |
| Net Income | -$21.6M↓21% | -$3.1M↓234% | -$7.1M↓133% | $9.2M↑106% | -$166.5M↓779% | -$18.9M | -$19.0M↓17% | -$16.2M |
| EPS (Diluted) | -- | $-0.16↓45% | $-0.53↓125% | $0.82↑102% | $-35.21↓3812% | $-0.90↑1% | $-0.91↑5% | $-0.96 |
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — | -640.7%↑99% | -62997.3%↓601% | -8981.4%↓3% | -8684.5%↓19% | -7299.1% |
| ROE | -1275.3%↓491% | — | — | -1457.9%↓377% | 526.5%↑397% | -177.5%↓165% | -67.0%↓91% | -35.0% |
| Total Debt | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Shareholders' Equity | $1.7M↓80% | $1.7M↓80% | -$5.3M↓189% | -$629.0K↑98% | -$31.6M↓396% | $10.7M↓62% | $28.3M↓39% | $46.1M |
| Current Ratio | 0.93↓56% | 0.93↓56% | 0.43↓76% | 0.72↓67% | 2.16↓12% | 2.46↓50% | 4.89↓46% | 9.06 |
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Cash Flow | -$16.8M↑37% | -$7.5M↓26% | -$2.6M↑53% | -$18.2M↑39% | -$29.8M↓66% | -$17.9M↓10% | -$16.3M↑16% | -$19.5M |
| Free Cash Flow | -- | -- | -- | -$20.8M↑38% | -$33.4M↓86% | -$17.9M | -- | -- |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Pharmaceutical Products
TRAW vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Greenblatt | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Merck & Co., Inc.MRK | $364.3B | $147.76 | $65.0B | $18.3B | 34.7% | 0.94 | — | 1.54 | 2/9 | 5/9 | 4/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 4 | 1/11 |
| ABBOTT LABORATORIESABT | $188.0B | $108.52 | $44.3B | $6.5B | 12.5% | 0.25 | 18.2% | 1.58 | 3/9 | 4/9 | 2/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 5 | 3/11 |
| BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB COBMY | $129.7B | $63.43 | $48.2B | $7.1B | 38.2% | 2.44 | 19.4% | 1.26 | 2/9 | 1/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 8 | 5/11 |
| BIO-TECHNE CorpTECH | $11.4B | $72.80 | $1.2B | $73.4M | 3.8% | — | 8.4% | 3.46 | 4/9 | 3/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 5 | 4/11 |
| REPLIGEN CORPRGEN | $10.7B | $167.79 | $738.3M | $48.9M | 2.3% | 0.26 | 7.5% | 8.37 | 3/9 | 2/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 7 | 5/11 |
| IONIS PHARMACEUTICALS INCIONS | $4.8B | $29.06 | $943.7M | $381.4M | -78.0% | 3.60 | -40.4% | 3.83 | 3/9 | 1/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 4 | 3/11 |
| NEOGEN CORPNEOG | $2.5B | $11.23 | $870.4M | $7.9M | -0.4% | 0.76 | -2.5% | 3.82 | 3/9 | 1/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 4/11 |
| Pharvaris N.V.PHVS | $2.4B | $33.36 | — | $206.4M | -64.8% | 0.00 | — | — | 0/9 | 0/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 2 | 2/11 |