MAMMOTH ENERGY SERVICES, INC.

TUSK
About the company

Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. operates as an energy services company in the United States, Canada, and internationally. It operates in four segments: Well Completion Services, Infrastructure Services, and Natural Sand Proppant Services. The company offers hydraulic fracturing, sand hauling, water transfer, master services agreements.

Country: United StatesPrice: $3.26Market Cap: $156.9M

Investment snapshot

6%positive consensus
Scored 1d ago

Positive

1

BUY / PASS

Neutral / negative

3 / 12

NEUTRAL / FAIL

Median fair value

$68.55

+2002.6% vs price

Models with upside

2 / 17

Positive margin of safety

Strongest signal

TUSK undervalued: all 2 models price fair value above $3.26 (median $68.55)

Key risk

No clean pass — all 8 investors flag at least one growth criterion

Framework analysis

VerdictMeaning
BUYPositive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met.
PASSThe company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state.
NEUTRALNeither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position.
FAILThe company does not clear the framework's requirements.
RankedRanked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL.

Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.

MetricGraham

Defensive Value

Buffett

Quality Compounder

Lynch

GARP

Greenblatt

Magic Formula

Piotroski

F-Score

Dreman

Contrarian Value

Munger

Quality Focus

Pabrai

Dhandho Framework

Akre

Three-Legged Stool

Marks

Risk-Aware Value

Ackman

Activist Value

Templeton

Global Bargain Hunter

Sleep

Scale Economies Shared

Asness

Systematic Factors

Neff

Low-P/E Total Return

Schloss

Asset-Value Discipline

O'Shaughnessy

Systematic Factor Composite

VerdictFAILFAILFAILFAIL · Rank #2707 (Top 87.4%)PASSFAILFAILFAILFAILFAILFAILFAILFAILNEUTRALFAILNEUTRALNEUTRAL
Score
AnalysisChecking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…
Intrinsic Value (annual)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Margin of Safety+6.1%N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A+97.6%N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Financial Basis

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-10-30

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 vs 2025-09-30 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-10-30

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-10-30

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-10-30

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-03-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-10-30

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-03-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Market data at 2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-10-30

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-10-30

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2026-03-06

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 · Annual history · FY 2025

Latest source filing: 2026-10-30

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · TTM ended 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-10-30

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2025 · Balance sheet at 2026-09-30

Latest source filing: 2026-10-30

Score computed: 2026-11-14

TTM ended 2026-09-30 · Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01

Latest source filing: 2026-10-30

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Where It Passes

  • Valuation models100% pass✓ 2▾

    TUSK undervalued: all 2 models price fair value above $3.26 (median $68.55)

    Graham fair value$3.47
    ✓Graham+6.1% margin vs $3.26
    Munger fair value$133.62
    ✓Munger+97.6% margin vs $3.26
  • Debt & Leverage67% pass✓ 11✗ 4▾

    8 of 12 pass — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +1 more object

    LT Debt vs Net Current Assets
    ✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
    Debt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.00, IC: -92.6x
    ✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
    Total Debt / Equity0
    ✓Lynch< 0.33
    Cash - Long-term Debt
    ✗LynchPositive preferred
    LT Debt / Total Assets Change0.00% -> 0.00%
    ✓PiotroskiDecreased YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities1.50
    ✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)
    Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0
    ✓Dreman< 0.8✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓SchlossD/E < 1.00x
    Debt Levels0
    ✓MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✓AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3
    Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=-92.6x, D/EBITDA=N/A
    ✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
    Total Debt / Shareholders Equity0
    ✓Ackman<= 1.0
    Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-0.0015; #394/4210 (top 9.4%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section

Where It Falls Short

  • Growth0% pass✓ 1✗ 12▾

    No clean pass — all 8 investors flag at least one growth criterion

    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 32.6x (growth N/A)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    Inventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: 245.7% vs Rev: -54.4%
    ✗LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
    EPS Growth Direction
    ✗DremanPositive over recent years
    EPS CAGR-28.2% CAGR over 8 years
    ✗Dreman> 5% annualized
    Positive Net Income Frequency3/12 years positive
    ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    3yr Median Revenue Growth-14.5%
    ✗Ackman>= 5%
    Positive EPS Growth Frequency3/5 years with positive EPS growth
    ✓AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
    5-Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue flat/down, operating margin -5.4% -> -129.7%
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    5-year Revenue CAGR-32.4%
    ✗SleepCAGR > 7%
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
  • Profitability6% pass✓ 4✗ 31▾

    15 of 16 flag TUSK's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +12 more

    Net income / market capitalization+8.58%; #874/6340 (top 13.8%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Positive EPS (10 years)3/13 years positive
    ✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Net Income Positive (10+ years)3/13 years positive
    ✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
    ROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)-20.6%
    ✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)
    Operating Margin (10-yr trend)-129.7% (latest)
    ✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
    Free Cash Flow Proxy$-57.2M
    ✗BuffettPositive and growing
    Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)
    ✗BuffettCoV < 0.3
    Retained Earnings Effectiveness
    ✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 32.6x (growth N/A)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    ROE5.1%
    ✗Lynch> 15%
    EBIT / Enterprise Value-104.5%
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-104.5%, ROC=-51.6%
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Net Income / Total Assets1.37%
    ✓PiotroskiROA > 0
    ROA Change YoY-53.99% -> 1.37% (delta: +55.36%)
    ✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-5.55%, ROA=1.37%
    ✗PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Gross Margin Change YoY
    ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Pre-Tax Income / Revenue-7.7%
    ✗Dreman>= 8%
    Net Income / Shareholders' Equity5.1%
    ✗Dreman> 12%
    Margin of SafetyP/E=32.6x, P/B=0.6x
    ✓PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15
    Return on Equity-27.0% (3-yr avg)
    ✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
    Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Positive Net Income Frequency3/12 years positive
    ✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    Operating Income / Revenue-15.2%
    ✗Ackman>= 15%
    Net Income / Shareholders Equity5.1%
    ✗Ackman>= 15%
    5-Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Operating Margin Trend-5.4% (2023) -> -129.7% (2025)
    ✗TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 years
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue flat/down, operating margin -5.4% -> -129.7%
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    Gross profit / total assets
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Net income / positive book equity+5.12%; #2442/5226 (top 46.7%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Negative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.2103; #4281/5884 (top 72.8%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
    Positive Diluted-EPS Years3/10 years positive
    ✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)
  • Verdicts7% pass✓ 1✗ 13▾

    Split decision: 12 FAIL · 3 NEUTRAL · 1 PASS

    Overall verdict
    ✗GrahamFAIL (1/9)✗BuffettFAIL (0/9)✗LynchFAIL (1/7)✗GreenblattRank #2707✓PiotroskiPASS (F-Score 5)✗DremanFAIL (3/11)✗MungerFAIL (1/4)✗PabraiFAIL (1/3)✗AkreFAIL (1/6)✗MarksFAIL (2/5)✗AckmanFAIL (3/9)✗TempletonFAIL (3/8)✗SleepFAIL (2/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗NeffFAIL (0/6)•SchlossNEUTRAL (4/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked)
  • Valuation8% pass✓ 8✗ 20▾

    12 of 13 flag TUSK's valuation — Graham, Lynch, Greenblatt +9 more

    Net income / market capitalization+8.58%; #874/6340 (top 13.8%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Price / 3-yr avg EPS
    ✗Graham<= 15x
    Price-to-Book Ratio0.6x
    ✓Graham<= 1.5x
    P/E x P/B
    ✗Graham<= 22.5
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 32.6x (growth N/A)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    EBIT / Enterprise Value-104.5%
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-104.5%, ROC=-51.6%
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Price / EPS32.6x
    ✗Dreman< 12x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)
    Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)
    ✗Dreman< 8x
    Price / Book Value per Share0.6x
    ✓Dreman< 1.2x✓Templeton< 1.5x✓SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)
    Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=32.6x, OE Yield=-36.3%
    ✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
    P/E or FCF YieldP/E=32.6x, FCF Yield=-56.8%
    ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=32.6x, P/B=0.6x
    ✓MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
    Discount to Intrinsic ValueN/A (negative normalized EPS)
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Price / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)
    ✗Ackman<= 25
    Price vs. Trailing Low177% of trailing low ($1.84)
    ✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)
    Positive book equity / market capitalization+1.6735; #804/6449 (top 12.5%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Price / Diluted EPS32.6x
    ✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)
    (EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E
    ✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)
    Price / Tangible Book Value per Share0.61x
    ✓SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)
    Book Value per Share Change-56.6%
    ✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)
    Revenue / market capitalization+0.4265; #2839/5247 (top 54.1%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-91.05%; #4043/4519 (top 89.5%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Trailing six-month price return through the evaluation date+35.27%; #900/6202 (top 14.5%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
  • Cash Flow20% pass✓ 2✗ 10▾

    8 of 10 flag TUSK's cash flow — Buffett, Lynch, Piotroski +5 more

    Free Cash Flow Proxy$-57.2M
    ✗BuffettPositive and growing
    FCF Positive and Growing$-142.9M
    ✗LynchPositive and growing
    Operating Cash Flow$-18.6M
    ✗PiotroskiCFO > 0
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-5.55%, ROA=1.37%
    ✗PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)
    ✗Dreman< 8x
    P/E or FCF YieldP/E=32.6x, FCF Yield=-56.8%
    ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    FCF Positive3/5 years FCF positive
    ✓MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years
    (OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap-90.6%
    ✗Ackman>= 4%
    Price / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)
    ✗Ackman<= 25
    Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency9/12 years positive
    ✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years
    Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$-142.9M
    ✗Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-91.05%; #4043/4519 (top 89.5%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
  • Efficiency25% pass✓ 3✗ 8▾

    6 of 8 flag TUSK's efficiency — Graham, Buffett, Greenblatt +3 more

    Current Ratio1.50
    ✗Graham>= 2.0
    ROIC (3-5 yr avg)-20.3%
    ✗Buffett> 10%
    ROIC - WACC-30.3%
    ✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
    EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)-51.6%
    ✗Greenblatt> 25%
    Current Ratio Change YoY1.65 -> 2.53
    ✓PiotroskiIncreased YoY
    Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.12x -> 0.13x
    ✓PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities1.50
    ✓Dreman> 1.5
    Return on Invested Capital-3.1%
    ✗Munger> 15%
    ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=-2.6%; FY2024: ROIC=-37.6%; FY2025: ROIC=-17.6%
    ✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in each
    Reinvestment Rate x ROIC-17.6% (RR=100% x ROIC=-17.6%)
    ✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
    ROIC (5-year)0/5 years above 12% (latest -17.6%)
    ✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years

Business & financials

Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.

Company Profile

Industry: Petroleum and Natural Gas
SIC Sector: Oil & Gas Extraction
Size: Micro Cap($156.9M)
Revenue: $44.3M-2.9% YoY
Net Income: $4.6M+102.2% YoY

Financial Snapshot

Operating Margin-129.7%
Return on Equity1.8%
Debt / Equity0.00
Current Ratio2.53
EPS (Diluted)$0.10
Shares Retired−0.5% / −0.9% 2y

Similar Companies

TTETotalEnergies SE
$199.0B
COPCONOCOPHILLIPS
$168.2B
BPBP PLC
$117.7B
SUSUNCOR ENERGY INC
$80.5B

Shareholder Return

Fiscal 2025

Issued 0.5% of shares last year, 0.9% issued over two.

Buybacks
—
Dividends
—

Company Financials

Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years

TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.

The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.

MetricTTM · 2026-09-30

2025-10-01 – 2026-09-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: revenue, net income, operating income, ebit, pre tax income, operating cash flow, capex, buybacks.

Q3 FY 2026

2026-07-01 – 2026-09-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, capex, buybacks.

Q2 FY 2026

2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30

Sources · derived quarter values

Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, capex, buybacks.

Q1 FY 2026

2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31

Sources
FY 2025
Sources
  • 10-K · 2026-03-06
FY 2024
Sources
  • 10-K · 2025-03-07
FY 2023
Sources
  • 10-K · 2024-03-01
FY 2022
Sources
  • 10-K · 2023-02-24
FY 2021
Sources
  • 10-K · 2022-03-04
Market Cap$156.9Mcurrent------$113.2Mest.$143.9Mest.$168.3Mest.$308.9Mest.$80.8Mest.
Revenue$66.9M↓54%$21.3M↑44%$26.1M↑59%$22.0M↓65%$44.3M↓3%$45.6M↓85%$309.5M↓15%$362.1M↑58%$229.0M
Operating Income-$10.2M↑81%-$421.0K↑95%$2.6M↑107%-$869.0K↓271%-$57.4M↑52%-$120.4M↓621%-$16.7M↓2%-$16.4M↑87%-$123.0M
Net Income$13.5M↑168%$126.0K↑101%-$760.0K↓109%$5.2M↑1066%$4.6M↑102%-$207.3M↓6455%-$3.2M↓411%-$619.0K↑99%-$101.4M
EPS (Diluted)--$0.01↑104%$-0.01↓106%$0.11↑1200%$0.10↑102%$-4.31↓6057%$-0.07↓600%$-0.01↑100%$-2.18
Gross Margin——————19.9%↓14%23.1%↑72%13.4%
Operating Margin-15.2%↑59%-2.0%↑97%10.1%↑105%-3.9%↓584%-129.7%↑51%-263.9%↓4796%-5.4%↓19%-4.5%↑92%-53.7%
ROE5.1%↑165%———1.8%↑102%-82.0%↓11829%-0.7%↓414%-0.1%↑99%-21.9%
Total Debt$406.0K↑230%$406.0K↑230%$433.0K↑127%$49.0K↓99%$75.0K$0↓100%$42.8M↓49%$83.5M↓4%$86.7M
Shareholders' Equity$262.6M↑5%$262.6M↑5%$262.4M$262.9M↑4%$258.3M↑2%$252.8M↓45%$460.1M↓1%$462.6M$463.2M
Current Ratio1.50↓39%1.50↓39%1.93↓23%2.45↑38%2.53↑54%1.65↓39%2.72↑30%2.09↓29%2.93
Debt / Equity0.00↑213%0.00↑213%0.00↑126%0.00↓100%0.000.00↓100%0.09↓48%0.18↓4%0.19
Operating Cash Flow-$19.4M↓115%$91.0K↓88%-$7.0M↑44%-$3.0M↓212%-$18.6M↓110%$180.7M↑476%$31.4M↑106%$15.3M↑181%-$18.9M
Free Cash Flow-$142.9M↓275%-$41.8M↓152%-$51.0M↓56%-$14.7M↓226%-$89.1M↓150%$179.5M↑1397%$12.0M↑374%$2.5M↑110%-$24.7M

Score history

Historical Score Timeline

Industry peers

Industry Peers

Similar companies in Petroleum and Natural Gas

TUSK vs Peers — Financial Grading

Revenue$44.3MBottom 25%
Net Income$4.6MBottom 25%
ROE1.8%Bottom 25%
D/E0.00Top 25%
Op. Margin-129.7%Bottom 25%
Curr. Ratio2.53Top 25%
CompanyMarket CapPriceRevenueNet IncomeROED/EOp. MarginCurr. RatioGrahamBuffettLynchGreenblattPiotroskiDreman
TotalEnergies SETTE$199.0B$90.74$201.2B$13.1B11.4%0.49—0.974/94/91/70/3F-Score 46/11
CONOCOPHILLIPSCOP$168.2B$142.28$58.9B$8.0B12.4%0.36—1.302/93/93/70/3F-Score 76/11
BP PLCBP$117.7B$45.70$192.5B$55.0M0.1%1.096.6%1.261/93/91/70/3F-Score 52/11
SUNCOR ENERGY INCSU$80.5B$69.92$38.2B$4.3B13.1%0.22—1.392/92/92/70/3F-Score 46/11
CENOVUS ENERGY INC.CVE$52.6B$29.08$36.3B$2.9B12.4%0.35—1.571/91/93/70/3F-Score 55/11
WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTDWDS$40.1B$21.08$13.0B$2.7B7.6%0.3330.0%1.593/94/90/70/3F-Score 47/11
EXPAND ENERGY CorpEXE$20.4B$88.53$12.1B$1.8B9.8%0.2720.4%1.012/95/93/71/3F-Score 77/11
YPF SOCIEDAD ANONIMAYPF$14.9B$37.90$18.4B$826.0M-7.6%0.989.4%0.872/91/91/70/3F-Score 43/11