UNIT CORP

UNTCW
About the company

Unit Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, develops, acquires, and produces oil and natural gas properties in the United States. The company operates through Oil and Natural Gas and Contract Drilling segments. The Oil and Natural Gas segment explores for, acquires, develops, and produces oil and natural gas properties.

Country: United StatesPrice: $2.36Market Cap: $22.7M

Investment snapshot

41%positive consensus
Scored 1d ago

Positive

7

BUY / PASS

Neutral / negative

5 / 4

NEUTRAL / FAIL

Median fair value

$99.83

+4130.1% vs price

Models with upside

5 / 17

Positive margin of safety

Strongest signal

All 12 investors pass UNTCW's debt & leverage

Key risk

Split decision: 5 PASS · 5 NEUTRAL · 4 FAIL · 2 BUY

Framework analysis

VerdictMeaning
BUYPositive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met.
PASSThe company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state.
NEUTRALNeither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position.
FAILThe company does not clear the framework's requirements.
RankedRanked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL.

Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.

MetricGraham

Defensive Value

Buffett

Quality Compounder

Lynch

GARP

Greenblatt

Magic Formula

Piotroski

F-Score

Dreman

Contrarian Value

Munger

Quality Focus

Pabrai

Dhandho Framework

Akre

Three-Legged Stool

Marks

Risk-Aware Value

Ackman

Activist Value

Templeton

Global Bargain Hunter

Sleep

Scale Economies Shared

Asness

Systematic Factors

Neff

Low-P/E Total Return

Schloss

Asset-Value Discipline

O'Shaughnessy

Systematic Factor Composite

VerdictPASSFAILFAILNot rankedBUYNEUTRALBUYNEUTRALPASSFAILPASSPASSPASSNEUTRALFAILNEUTRALNEUTRAL
Score
AnalysisChecking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…Checking access…
Intrinsic Value (annual)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Margin of Safety+97.6%+98.3%N/AN/AN/AN/A+98.5%N/A+92.3%N/A+97.3%N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Financial Basis

Annual history · FY 2022

Latest source filing: 2023-03-17

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2022

Latest source filing: 2023-03-17

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2022

Latest source filing: 2023-03-17

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2022

Latest source filing: 2023-03-17

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2022

Latest source filing: 2023-03-17

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2022 · Market data at 2026-10-01

Latest source filing: 2023-03-17

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2022

Latest source filing: 2023-03-17

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2022

Latest source filing: 2023-03-17

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2022 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2023-03-17

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2022 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2023-03-17

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2022 · Market data at 2026-10-01

Latest source filing: 2023-03-17

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2022 · Price history 2026-08-01–2026-10-01

Latest source filing: 2023-03-17

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2022 · Qualitative assessment

Latest source filing: 2023-03-17

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2022 · Price history 2026-08-01–2026-10-01

Latest source filing: 2023-03-17

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2022

Latest source filing: 2023-03-17

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2022

Latest source filing: 2023-03-17

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Annual history · FY 2022 · Price history 2026-08-01–2026-10-01

Latest source filing: 2023-03-17

Score computed: 2026-11-14

Where It Passes

  • Debt & Leverage100% pass✓ 15▾

    All 12 investors pass UNTCW's debt & leverage

    LT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $0.0M vs NCA $207.2M
    ✓GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
    Debt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.00, IC: 545.8x
    ✓BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
    Total Debt / Equity0
    ✓Lynch< 0.33
    Cash - Long-term Debt$214.0M
    ✓LynchPositive preferred
    LT Debt / Total Assets Change3.05% -> 0.00%
    ✓PiotroskiDecreased YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities4.04
    ✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)
    Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0
    ✓Dreman< 0.8✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓SchlossD/E < 1.00x
    Debt Levels0
    ✓MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✓AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3
    Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=545.8x, D/EBITDA=0.0x
    ✓MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
    Total Debt / Shareholders Equity0
    ✓Ackman<= 1.0
    Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-0.0000; #1/4210 (top 0.0%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
  • Valuation models100% pass✓ 5▾

    UNTCW undervalued: all 5 models price fair value above $2.36 (median $99.83)

    Graham fair value$99.83
    ✓Graham+97.6% margin vs $2.36
    Buffett fair value$138.80
    ✓Buffett+98.3% margin vs $2.36
    Munger fair value$154.79
    ✓Munger+98.5% margin vs $2.36
    Akre fair value$30.58
    ✓Akre+92.3% margin vs $2.36
    Ackman fair value$88.17
    ✓Ackman+97.3% margin vs $2.36
  • Efficiency75% pass✓ 9✗ 2▾

    6 of 8 pass — Akre and Sleep object

    Current Ratio4.04
    ✓Graham>= 2.0
    ROIC (3-5 yr avg)39.4%
    ✓Buffett> 10%
    ROIC - WACC+29.4%
    ✓BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
    EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)144.7%
    ✓Greenblatt> 25%
    Current Ratio Change YoY1.04 -> 4.04
    ✓PiotroskiIncreased YoY
    Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY1.01x -> 1.16x
    ✓PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities4.04
    ✓Dreman> 1.5
    Return on Invested Capital53.2%
    ✓Munger> 15%
    ROIC (high and growing)FY2020: ROIC=unavailable; FY2021: ROIC=66.6%; FY2022: ROIC=53.2%
    ✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in each
    Reinvestment Rate x ROIC53.2% (RR=100% x ROIC=53.2%)
    ✓AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
    ROIC (5-year)2/4 years above 12% (latest 53.2%)
    ✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years
  • Cash Flow70% pass✓ 9✗ 3▾

    7 of 10 pass — Buffett, Lynch and Marks object

    Free Cash Flow Proxy$142.1M
    ✗BuffettPositive and growing
    FCF Positive and Growing$129.0M
    ✗LynchPositive and growing
    Operating Cash Flow$159.4M
    ✓PiotroskiCFO > 0
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=33.97%, ROA=31.62%
    ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Price / (CFO / Shares)0.1x
    ✓Dreman< 8x
    P/E or FCF YieldP/E=0.2x, FCF Yield=567.5%
    ✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    FCF Positive5/14 years FCF positive
    ✗MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years
    (OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap567.5%
    ✓Ackman>= 4%
    Price / FCF per Share0.2x
    ✓Ackman<= 25
    Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency14/14 years positive
    ✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years
    Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$129.0M
    ✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+567.47%; #23/4519 (top 0.5%)
    ✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
  • Verdicts64% pass✓ 7✗ 4▾

    Split decision: 5 PASS · 5 NEUTRAL · 4 FAIL · 2 BUY

    Overall verdict
    ✓GrahamPASS (4/9)✗BuffettFAIL (3/9)✗LynchFAIL (4/7)•GreenblattNot ranked✓PiotroskiBUY (F-Score 8)•DremanNEUTRAL (7/11)✓MungerBUY (4/4)•PabraiNEUTRAL (2/3)✓AkrePASS (3/6)✗MarksFAIL (3/5)✓AckmanPASS (5/9)✓TempletonPASS (4/8)✓SleepPASS (3/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗NeffFAIL (2/6)•SchlossNEUTRAL (4/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked)

Where It Falls Short

  • Growth13% pass✓ 2✗ 11▾

    7 of 8 flag UNTCW's growth — Graham, Lynch, Dreman +4 more

    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    Inventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthN/A (no inventory)
    ✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
    EPS Growth Direction
    ✗DremanPositive over recent years
    EPS CAGR
    ✗Dreman> 5% annualized
    Positive Net Income Frequency9/14 years positive
    ✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    3yr Median Revenue Growth-8.6%
    ✗Ackman>= 5%
    Positive EPS Growth Frequency
    ✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
    5-Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trend
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    5-year Revenue CAGR-5.9%
    ✗SleepCAGR > 7%
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
  • Profitability25% pass✓ 13✗ 22▾

    12 of 16 flag UNTCW's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +9 more

    Positive EPS (10 years)9/16 years positive
    ✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)
    ✗Graham>= 33% growth
    Net Income Positive (10+ years)9/16 years positive
    ✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
    ROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)2.8%
    ✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)
    Operating Margin (10-yr trend)44.7% (latest)
    ✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
    Free Cash Flow Proxy$142.1M
    ✗BuffettPositive and growing
    Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)
    ✗BuffettCoV < 0.3
    Retained Earnings Effectiveness
    ✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    ROE40.9%
    ✓Lynch> 15%
    EBIT / Enterprise ValueN/A (EV <= 0)
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=N/A (EV <= 0), ROC=144.7%
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Net Income / Total Assets31.62%
    ✓PiotroskiROA > 0
    ROA Change YoY9.63% -> 31.62% (delta: +21.98%)
    ✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=33.97%, ROA=31.62%
    ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Gross Margin Change YoY
    ✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
    Pre-Tax Income / Revenue26.2%
    ✓Dreman>= 8%
    Net Income / Shareholders' Equity40.9%
    ✓Dreman> 12%
    Margin of SafetyP/E=0.2x, P/B=0.1x
    ✓PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15
    Return on Equity2.8% (3-yr avg)
    ✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
    Discount to Intrinsic Value
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Positive Net Income Frequency9/14 years positive
    ✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    Operating Income / Revenue44.7%
    ✓Ackman>= 15%
    Net Income / Shareholders Equity40.9%
    ✓Ackman>= 15%
    5-Year EPS CAGR
    ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Operating Margin Trend
    ✗TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 years
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trend
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    Net income / market capitalization+652.50%; #29/6340 (top 0.5%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Gross profit / total assets
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Net income / positive book equity+40.92%; #278/5226 (top 5.3%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Negative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.2095; #4276/5884 (top 72.7%)
    ✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
    Positive Diluted-EPS Years5/9 years positive
    ✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)
  • Valuation38% pass✓ 18✗ 10▾

    8 of 13 flag UNTCW's valuation — Graham, Lynch, Greenblatt +5 more

    Price / 3-yr avg EPS
    ✗Graham<= 15x
    Price-to-Book Ratio0.1x
    ✓Graham<= 1.5x
    P/E x P/B
    ✗Graham<= 22.5
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    EBIT / Enterprise ValueN/A (EV <= 0)
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=N/A (EV <= 0), ROC=144.7%
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Price / EPS0.2x
    ✓Dreman< 12x✓Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)
    Price / (CFO / Shares)0.1x
    ✓Dreman< 8x
    Price / Book Value per Share0.1x
    ✓Dreman< 1.2x✓Templeton< 1.5x✓SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)
    Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=0.2x, OE Yield=625.0%
    ✓MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
    P/E or FCF YieldP/E=0.2x, FCF Yield=567.5%
    ✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=0.2x, P/B=0.1x
    ✓MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
    Discount to Intrinsic Value
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Price / FCF per Share0.2x
    ✓Ackman<= 25
    Price vs. Trailing Low
    ✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)
    Net income / market capitalization+652.50%; #29/6340 (top 0.5%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Positive book equity / market capitalization+15.9477; #143/6449 (top 2.2%)
    ✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
    Price / Diluted EPS0.2x
    ✓NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)
    (EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E
    ✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)
    Price / Tangible Book Value per Share0.06x
    ✓SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)
    Book Value per Share Change
    ✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)
    Revenue / market capitalization+23.9913; #188/5247 (top 3.6%)
    ✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+567.47%; #23/4519 (top 0.5%)
    ✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Trailing six-month price return through the evaluation date
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section

Business & financials

Financial snapshot: annual FY 2022. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.

Company Profile

Industry: Petroleum and Natural Gas
SIC Sector: Oil & Gas Extraction
Size: Micro Cap($22.7M)
Revenue: $545.5M-14.6% YoY
Net Income: $148.4M+144.6% YoY

Financial Snapshot

Operating Margin44.7%
Return on Equity40.9%
Debt / Equity0.00
Current Ratio4.04
EPS (Diluted)$14.78+181.0% 1y
Buybacks (1y)$27.4M
Buybacks (2y)$79.4M
Shares Retired4.1% / 19.7% 2y

Shareholder Return

Fiscal 2022

Retired 4.1% of shares last year, 19.7% over two.

Buybacks
$27.4M
Dividends
—

What drove EPS

A buyback raises earnings per share without the company earning more. This splits each year's change into the two.

FY22
181.0% = 144.6% + 14.9%
Earnings Fewer shares More shares

The two parts do not sum exactly to the total — the difference is the cross-term, plus preferred capital where the company has any. It is left visible rather than distributed into the other two.

Share count is the denominator the filer used for diluted EPS, recovered as net income ÷ EPS — not the balance-sheet count, which is a point-in-time figure and would put the timing difference into this split. Years with a loss are omitted: a smaller share count makes a loss per share larger, so the decomposition inverts.

Company Financials

Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years

TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.

MetricFY 2022
Sources
  • 10-K · 2023-03-17
FY 2021
Sources
  • 10-K · 2022-03-31
FY 2020
Sources
  • 10-K · 2022-03-31
FY 2019
Sources
  • 10-K · 2020-03-16
FY 2018
Sources
  • 10-K · 2019-02-26
Market Cap$22.7Mcurrent--------
Revenue$545.5M↓15%$638.7M--$674.6M↓20%$843.3M
Operating Income$244.0M↑40%$174.1M---$653.1M↓3718%-$17.1M
Net Income$148.4M↑145%$60.6M---$553.9M↓1123%-$45.3M
EPS (Diluted)$14.78↑181%$5.26--$-10.48↓1105%$-0.87
Gross Margin—————
Operating Margin44.7%↑64%27.3%—-96.8%↓4672%-2.0%
ROE40.9%↑26%32.4%—-64.9%↓1892%-3.3%
Total Debt$0↓100%$19.2M↓81%$99.0M↓87%$771.4M↑20%$644.5M
Shareholders' Equity$362.6M↑94%$187.4M↑5%$179.2M↓79%$853.9M↓39%$1.4B
Current Ratio4.04↑289%1.04↑1%1.03↑155%0.40↓49%0.80
Debt / Equity0.00↓100%0.10↓81%0.55↓39%0.90↑95%0.46
Operating Cash Flow$159.4M↓9%$176.0M--$269.4M↓24%$352.7M
Free Cash Flow$129.0M↓11%$145.7M---$137.3M↓47%-$93.5M

Score history

Historical Score Timeline

Industry peers

Industry Peers

Similar companies in Petroleum and Natural Gas

UNTCW vs Peers — Financial Grading

Revenue$545.5MBottom 25%
Net Income$148.4MBottom 25%
ROE40.9%Top 25%
D/E0.00Top 25%
Op. Margin44.7%Top 25%
Curr. Ratio4.04Top 25%
CompanyMarket CapPriceRevenueNet IncomeROED/EOp. MarginCurr. RatioGrahamBuffettLynchGreenblattPiotroskiDreman
TotalEnergies SETTE$199.0B$90.74$201.2B$13.1B11.4%0.49—0.974/94/91/70/3F-Score 46/11
CONOCOPHILLIPSCOP$168.2B$142.28$58.9B$8.0B12.4%0.36—1.302/93/93/70/3F-Score 76/11
BP PLCBP$117.7B$45.70$192.5B$55.0M0.1%1.096.6%1.261/93/91/70/3F-Score 52/11
SUNCOR ENERGY INCSU$80.5B$69.92$38.2B$4.3B13.1%0.22—1.392/92/92/70/3F-Score 46/11
CENOVUS ENERGY INC.CVE$52.6B$29.08$36.3B$2.9B12.4%0.35—1.571/91/93/70/3F-Score 55/11
WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTDWDS$40.1B$21.08$13.0B$2.7B7.6%0.3330.0%1.593/94/90/70/3F-Score 47/11
EXPAND ENERGY CorpEXE$20.4B$88.53$12.1B$1.8B9.8%0.2720.4%1.012/95/93/71/3F-Score 77/11
YPF SOCIEDAD ANONIMAYPF$14.9B$37.90$18.4B$826.0M-7.6%0.989.4%0.872/91/91/70/3F-Score 43/11