NexMetals Mining Corp.

NEXM

NexMetals Mining Corp., a mineral exploration and evaluation company, focuses on the discovery and advancement of copper-nickel-cobalt-platinum group elements resources in Canada, Barbados, and Botswana. Its flagship are the Selebi and Selebi North copper-nickel-cobalt mines in Botswana and related infrastructure, as well as the Cu-Ni-Co-PGE Selkirk mine in Botswana, together with associated infrastructure and four surrounding prospecting licences. The company was formerly known as Premium Resources Ltd. and changed its name to NexMetals Mining Corp. in June 2025.

About the company

Country: CanadaPrice: $1.12Market Cap: $39.9M

Investment snapshot

24%positive consensus

Scored 1d ago

Positive

BUY / PASS

Neutral / negative

5 / 7

NEUTRAL / FAIL

Median fair value

$8.99

+702.7% vs price

Models with upside

5 / 17

Positive margin of safety

Strongest signal

NEXM undervalued: all 5 models price fair value above $1.12 (median $8.99)

Key risk

15 of 16 flag NEXM's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +12 more

Framework analysis

Verdict	Meaning
BUY	Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met.
PASS	The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state.
NEUTRAL	Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position.
FAIL	The company does not clear the framework's requirements.
Ranked	Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL.

Current investor scores use trailing 12-month flows and the latest balance sheet where supported. Multi-year and EPS tests retain annual history; each framework shows its financial basis below. Intrinsic values use annual financials.

Metric	Graham Defensive Value	Buffett Quality Compounder	Lynch GARP	Greenblatt Magic Formula	Piotroski F-Score	Dreman Contrarian Value	Munger Quality Focus	Pabrai Dhandho Framework	Akre Three-Legged Stool	Marks Risk-Aware Value	Ackman Activist Value	Templeton Global Bargain Hunter	Sleep Scale Economies Shared	Asness Systematic Factors	Neff Low-P/E Total Return	Schloss Asset-Value Discipline	O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite
Verdict	PASS	FAIL	FAIL	FAIL · Rank #3063 (Top 98.9%)	PASS	PASS	NEUTRAL	NEUTRAL	FAIL	FAIL	FAIL	BUY	FAIL	NEUTRAL	FAIL	NEUTRAL	NEUTRAL
Score
Analysis	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…	Checking access…
Intrinsic Value (annual)		N/A		N/A	N/A		N/A	N/A	N/A		N/A		N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Margin of Safety	+87.5%	N/A	+97.9%	N/A	N/A	+90.9%	N/A	N/A	N/A	+74.5%	N/A	+27.3%	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Financial Basis	Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-13 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-13 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-13 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-13 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-13 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-03-13 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-13 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Qualitative assessment · Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-13 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-03-13 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-03-13 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 · Market data at 2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-03-13 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-03-13 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 · Qualitative assessment Latest source filing: 2026-03-13 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-03-13 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-13 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 Latest source filing: 2026-03-13 Score computed: 2026-11-14	Annual history · FY 2025 · Price history 2025-01-01–2026-11-01 Latest source filing: 2026-03-13 Score computed: 2026-11-14

Where It Passes

Valuation models100% pass✓ 5▾
NEXM undervalued: all 5 models price fair value above $1.12 (median $8.99)
Graham fair value$8.99
✓Graham+87.5% margin vs $1.12
Lynch fair value$52.45
✓Lynch+97.9% margin vs $1.12
Dreman fair value$12.28
✓Dreman+90.9% margin vs $1.12
Marks fair value$4.40
✓Marks+74.5% margin vs $1.12
Templeton fair value$1.54
✓Templeton+27.3% margin vs $1.12
Debt & Leverage67% pass✓ 11✗ 4▾
8 of 12 pass — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +1 more object
LT Debt vs Net Current Assets
✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
Debt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.00, IC: -171.3x
✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
Total Debt / Equity0
✓Lynch< 0.33
Cash - Long-term Debt
✗LynchPositive preferred
LT Debt / Total Assets Change0.00% -> 0.00%
✓PiotroskiDecreased YoY
Current Assets / Current Liabilities4.67
✓Dreman> 1.5✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)
Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0
✓Dreman< 0.8✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓SchlossD/E < 1.00x
Debt Levels0
✓MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✓AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3
Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=-171.3x, D/EBITDA=N/A
✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
Total Debt / Shareholders Equity0
✓Ackman<= 1.0
Negative debt-to-equity (higher means less debt)-0.0029; #444/4210 (top 10.5%)
✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section

Where It Falls Short

Profitability6% pass✓ 7✗ 28▾
15 of 16 flag NEXM's profitability — Graham, Buffett, Lynch +12 more
Positive EPS (10 years)4/12 years positive
✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)N/A (negative base EPS)
✗Graham>= 33% growth
Net Income Positive (10+ years)0/12 years positive
✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
ROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)-234.7%
✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)
Operating Margin (10-yr trend)
✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
Free Cash Flow Proxy$-43.3M
✗BuffettPositive and growing
Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)2.55
✗BuffettCoV < 0.3
Retained Earnings Effectiveness
✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)0.00
✓Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
3-5 Year EPS CAGR124.9%
✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
ROE-71.2%
✗Lynch> 15%
EBIT / Enterprise Value-394.4%
✗Greenblatt> 10%
Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-394.4%, ROC=-971.0%
✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
Net Income / Total Assets-59.97%
✗PiotroskiROA > 0
ROA Change YoY-170.00% -> -59.97% (delta: +110.02%)
✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-48.30%, ROA=-59.97%
✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
Gross Margin Change YoY
✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
Pre-Tax Income / Revenue
✗Dreman>= 8%
Net Income / Shareholders' Equity-71.2%
✗Dreman> 12%
Margin of SafetyP/E=0.5x, P/B=0.7x
✓PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15
Return on Equity-365.3% (3-yr avg)
✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
Discount to Intrinsic Value90.9% (IV=$12.28 vs Price=$1.12)
✓Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
Positive Net Income Frequency0/11 years positive
✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
Operating Income / Revenue
✗Ackman>= 15%
Net Income / Shareholders Equity-71.2%
✗Ackman>= 15%
5-Year EPS CAGR124.9% CAGR over 3 years
✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
Operating Margin Trend
✗TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 years
Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trend
✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
Net income / market capitalization-108.56%; #5426/6340 (top 85.6%)
✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
Gross profit / total assets
✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
Net income / positive book equity-71.23%; #4413/5226 (top 84.4%)
✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
Negative 5-year standard deviation of ROA-0.4732; #4902/5884 (top 83.3%)
✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR124.9% over 3 years
✗Neff7%-20% annualized
Positive Diluted-EPS Years4/8 years positive
✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)
Cash Flow10% pass✓ 2✗ 10▾
9 of 10 flag NEXM's cash flow — Buffett, Lynch, Piotroski +6 more
Free Cash Flow Proxy$-43.3M
✗BuffettPositive and growing
FCF Positive and Growing$-36.9M
✗LynchPositive and growing
Operating Cash Flow$-34.9M
✗PiotroskiCFO > 0
(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=-48.30%, ROA=-59.97%
✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)
✗Dreman< 8x
P/E or FCF YieldP/E=0.5x, FCF Yield=-92.5%
✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
FCF Positive0/8 years FCF positive
✗MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years
(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap-92.9%
✗Ackman>= 4%
Price / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)
✗Ackman<= 25
Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency0/11 years positive
✗SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years
Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$-36.9M
✗Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)
(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-92.54%; #4051/4519 (top 89.6%)
✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
Efficiency25% pass✓ 3✗ 8▾
6 of 8 flag NEXM's efficiency — Buffett, Greenblatt, Piotroski +3 more
Current Ratio4.67
✓Graham>= 2.0
ROIC (3-5 yr avg)
✗Buffett> 10%
ROIC - WACC
✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)-971.0%
✗Greenblatt> 25%
Current Ratio Change YoY1.81 -> 4.67
✓PiotroskiIncreased YoY
Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY
✗PiotroskiImproved YoY
Current Assets / Current Liabilities4.67
✓Dreman> 1.5
Return on Invested Capital
✗Munger> 15%
ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=unavailable; FY2024: ROIC=unavailable; FY2025: ROIC=unavailable
✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in each
Reinvestment Rate x ROIC
✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
ROIC (5-year)
✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years
Verdicts33% pass✓ 4✗ 8▾
Split decision: 7 FAIL · 5 NEUTRAL · 3 PASS · 1 BUY
Overall verdict
✓GrahamPASS (4/9)✗BuffettFAIL (0/9)✗LynchFAIL (4/7)✗GreenblattRank #3063✓PiotroskiPASS (F-Score 4)✓DremanPASS (6/11)•MungerNEUTRAL (3/4)•PabraiNEUTRAL (2/3)✗AkreFAIL (1/6)✗MarksFAIL (2/5)✗AckmanFAIL (1/9)✓TempletonBUY (6/8)✗SleepFAIL (0/6)•AsnessNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗NeffFAIL (1/6)•SchlossNEUTRAL (4/7)•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked)
Growth38% pass✓ 6✗ 7▾
5 of 8 flag NEXM's growth — Graham, Marks, Ackman +2 more
EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)N/A (negative base EPS)
✗Graham>= 33% growth
Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)0.00
✓Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
3-5 Year EPS CAGR124.9%
✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
Inventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthN/A (no inventory)
✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
EPS Growth Direction$-0.01 (2015) -> $2.10 (2025)
✓DremanPositive over recent years
EPS CAGR124.9% CAGR over 3 years
✓Dreman> 5% annualized
Positive Net Income Frequency0/11 years positive
✗MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
3yr Median Revenue Growth
✗Ackman>= 5%
Positive EPS Growth Frequency1/3 years with positive EPS growth
✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
5-Year EPS CAGR124.9% CAGR over 3 years
✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trend
✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
5-year Revenue CAGR
✗SleepCAGR > 7%
3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR124.9% over 3 years
✗Neff7%-20% annualized
Valuation46% pass✓ 17✗ 11▾
7 of 13 flag NEXM's valuation — Greenblatt, Dreman, Ackman +4 more
Price / 3-yr avg EPS1.4x
✓Graham<= 15x
Price-to-Book Ratio0.7x
✓Graham<= 1.5x
P/E x P/B0.90
✓Graham<= 22.5
Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)0.00
✓Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
EBIT / Enterprise Value-394.4%
✗Greenblatt> 10%
Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=-394.4%, ROC=-971.0%
✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
Price / EPS0.5x
✓Dreman< 12x✓Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)
Price / (CFO / Shares)N/A (negative CFPS)
✗Dreman< 8x
Price / Book Value per Share0.7x
✓Dreman< 1.2x✓Templeton< 1.5x✓SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)
Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=0.5x, OE Yield=-110.3%
✓MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
P/E or FCF YieldP/E=0.5x, FCF Yield=-92.5%
✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=0.5x, P/B=0.7x
✓MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
Discount to Intrinsic Value90.9% (IV=$12.28 vs Price=$1.12)
✓Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
Price / FCF per ShareN/A (negative FCF)
✗Ackman<= 25
Price vs. Trailing Low100% of trailing low ($1.12)
✓Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)
Net income / market capitalization-108.56%; #5426/6340 (top 85.6%)
✗AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
Positive book equity / market capitalization+1.5240; #895/6449 (top 13.9%)
✓AsnessTop 30% of eligible cross-section
Price / Diluted EPS0.5x
✓NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)
(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E
✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)
Price / Tangible Book Value per Share0.65x
✓SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)
Book Value per Share Change
✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)
Revenue / market capitalization
✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization-92.54%; #4051/4519 (top 89.6%)
✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
Trailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-58.52%; #5360/6202 (top 86.4%)
✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section

Business & financials

Financial snapshot: annual FY 2025. Current investor scores may use newer quarterly data.

Company Profile

Industry: Non-Metallic Mining

SIC Sector: Metal Mining

Size: Micro Cap($39.9M)

Revenue: N/A

Net Income: $43.3M-46.1% YoY

Financial Snapshot

Operating Margin--

Return on Equity-71.2%

Debt / Equity0.00

Current Ratio4.67

EPS (Diluted)$2.10

Similar Companies

BHPBHP Group Ltd

$202.0B

SCCOSOUTHERN COPPER CORP/

$140.0B

FCXFREEPORT-MCMORAN INC

$85.0B

VALEVale S.A.

$47.7B

Company Financials

Latest TTM and quarters alongside annual years

Values marked CAD retain their reported currency.

TTM sums four consecutive quarters and uses the latest quarter-end balances. Quarter columns show three-month results; annual columns show full-year totals. Growth compares the same period a year earlier. EPS is not added for TTM; full-year ratios are blank for quarters.

The latest annual period end is unavailable. Showing the latest fiscal cycle’s quarters; quarter and annual columns may overlap. Quarterly shows the full quarter history.

Metric	TTM · 2026-06-30 2025-07-01 – 2026-06-30 Sources · derived quarter values 10-Q · 2025-11-13 10-K · 2026-03-13 10-Q · 2026-05-13 10-Q · 2026-08-17 Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, depreciation amortization, capex, net income.	Q2 FY 2026 2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30 Sources · derived quarter values 10-Q · 2026-08-17 Derived from cumulative filings: operating cash flow, capex.	Q1 FY 2026 2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 Sources 10-Q · 2026-05-13	FY 2025 Sources 10-K · 2026-03-13	FY 2024 Sources 10-K · 2025-03-20	FY 2023 Sources 10-K · 2024-06-28	FY 2022 Sources 10-K · 2024-06-28	FY 2021 Sources 20-F · 2022-04-26
Market Cap	$39.9Mcurrent	--	--	$139.9Mest.	$1.0Best.	$2.9Best.	$3.1Best.	$5.9Best.
Revenue	--	--	--	--	--	--	--	--
Operating Income	--	--	--	--	--	--	--	--
Net Income	-CAD 51.3M↑4%	-CAD 11.9M↑21%	-CAD 10.6M↑30%	-$43.3M↓46%	-$29.7M↓26%	-$23.6M↓17%	-$20.1M↓174%	-$7.3M
EPS (Diluted)	--	CAD 0.33↓53%	CAD 0.30↑329%	$2.10↑1100%	$0.17↓4%	$0.18↓1%	$0.18	--
Gross Margin	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Operating Margin	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
ROE	-83.0%↑43%	—	—	-71.2%↓106%	1230.6%↑470%	-332.2%↑52%	-692.5%↓649%	126.2%
Total Debt	CAD 256.0K	CAD 256.0K	CAD 241.6K	$179.2K	--	$21.6M↑304%	$5.3M	--
Shareholders' Equity	CAD 61.7M↑69%	CAD 61.7M↑69%	CAD 71.7M↑39%	$60.8M↑2624%	-$2.4M↓134%	$7.1M↑144%	$2.9M↑150%	-$5.8M
Current Ratio	5.16↓3%	5.16↓3%	7.72↑20%	4.67↑158%	1.81↓48%	3.51↑579%	0.52↓86%	3.68
Debt / Equity	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	—	3.03↑65%	1.84	—
Operating Cash Flow	-CAD 47.0M↓13%	-CAD 8.9M↑42%	-CAD 12.2M↓94%	-$34.9M↓33%	-$26.3M↓22%	-$21.5M↓14%	-$18.9M↓1555%	-$1.1M
Free Cash Flow	-CAD 49.1M	-CAD 8.9M↑47%	-CAD 13.0M↓104%	-$36.9M↓37%	-$27.0M↓8%	-$25.0M↓29%	-$19.4M	--

Score history

Historical Score Timeline

Industry peers

Industry Peers

Similar companies in Non-Metallic Mining

NEXM vs Peers — Financial Grading

RevenueN/A

Net Income$43.3MBottom 25%

ROE-71.2%Bottom 25%

D/E0.00Top 25%

Op. Margin—

Curr. Ratio4.67Top 25%

Company	Market Cap	Price	Revenue	Net Income	ROE	D/E	Op. Margin	Curr. Ratio	Graham	Buffett	Lynch	Greenblatt	Piotroski	Dreman
BHP Group LtdBHP	$202.0B	$79.49	$51.3B	$9.0B	18.9%	0.45	38.0%	1.46	1/9	6/9	2/7	1/3	F-Score 5	7/11
SOUTHERN COPPER CORP/SCCO	$140.0B	$164.08	$13.4B	$4.3B	39.4%	0.61	52.2%	3.89	4/9	5/9	4/7	1/3	F-Score 7	5/11
FREEPORT-MCMORAN INCFCX	$85.0B	$59.24	$25.9B	$4.2B	22.0%	0.50	25.2%	2.29	2/9	5/9	3/7	0/3	F-Score 5	7/11
Vale S.A.VALE	$47.7B	$11.22	$38.4B	$2.4B	7.0%	0.02	15.4%	1.15	1/9	4/9	2/7	1/3	F-Score 3	4/11
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS INCMLM	$36.5B	$513.61	$6.2B	$1.1B	11.3%	0.53	23.4%	3.57	4/9	3/9	1/7	0/3	F-Score 8	7/11
Vulcan Materials COVMC	$35.8B	$278.63	$7.9B	$1.1B	12.6%	0.51	20.4%	2.69	2/9	2/9	2/7	0/3	F-Score 9	5/11
CAMECO CORPCCJ	$30.8B	$70.73	$2.5B	$430.5M	8.5%	0.14	17.8%	2.47	3/9	3/9	5/7	0/3	F-Score 8	6/11
TECK RESOURCES LTDTECK	$29.6B	$60.19	$7.9B	$1.0B	5.6%	0.16	20.9%	2.54	3/9	2/9	2/7	0/3	F-Score 8	4/11